The attached patch fixes the issue by removing the full path to
rebuild-gcj-db from the maintainer script snippets. This is valid
because rebuild-gcj-db is always installed if java-gcj-compat-dev gets
installed. This is the dependency chain:
java-gcj-compat depends on
libgcj9-0-awt depends on
libg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny1
> tags 511491 + patch
Bug#511491: java-gcj-compat-dev: postinst generated by dh_nativejava references
commands with prepended path
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patc
--- Comment #5 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-01-16 22:38 ---
Fixed on Trunk (4.4) and 4.3 branch. 4.2 branch is closed (or shortly will be)
so I am going to just close this as fixed.
--
sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 22:35 ---
Subject: Bug 38357
Author: sje
Date: Fri Jan 16 22:35:24 2009
New Revision: 143444
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143444
Log:
PR c++/31260
PR c++/38357
* pt.c (tsubst): Ch
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #248680
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16095
# * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGNED
u
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #390982
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29207
# * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> WAI
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #464156
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33263
# * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> NEW
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.3
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-defaults
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.deb
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-defaults
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #414178
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27574
# * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> R
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #75773
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR3507
# * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGNED
user
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #424626
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31947
# * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> NEW
* brian m. carlson [2009-01-16 18:38]:
> Obviously, since the two functions do the exact same thing, they should
> be optimized to be identical. Instead, mul is pessimized.
Can you check if this happens with gcc-4.3 and trunk from SVN, and if
so, file the bug upstream?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http
13 matches
Mail list logo
