[Bug bootstrap/37349] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken on Alpha: undefined reference to _Jv_RegisterClasses

2008-09-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 05:01 --- Confirmed via the dup. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/37464] bootstrap failure for alphaev56, undefined reference to `_Jv_RegisterClasses

2008-09-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 05:01 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37349 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug bootstrap/37349] [4.4 Regression] bootstrap broken on Alpha: undefined reference to _Jv_RegisterClasses

2008-09-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-14 05:01 --- *** Bug 37464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: Status of GCC 4.4 (Debian)

2008-09-13 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given that GCC moved to stage 3 recently, I decided to build the Debian > archive to identify new issues before GCC 4.4 is released. I compiled > the entire Debian archive (just under 8000 packages that need to be > com

[Bug target/37344] [4.4 Regression] sparc bootstrap fails with Bus error in libgcc2.c

2008-09-13 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-13 14:34 --- Presumably, similar problems on Solaris have been fixed by: 2008-09-11 Jeff Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * reload1.c (alter_reg): Undo the BYTE_BIG_ENDIAN correction performed by assign_stack_local o

Status of GCC 4.4 (Debian)

2008-09-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Given that GCC moved to stage 3 recently, I decided to build the Debian archive to identify new issues before GCC 4.4 is released. I compiled the entire Debian archive (just under 8000 packages that need to be compiled) on x86_64, ia64 and powerpc, and about 1800 packages on arm (EABI). I also wa

Bug#497770: marked as done (gcc-defaults: please list kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 as gcj architectures)

2008-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:33:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#497770: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.76 has caused the Debian Bug report #497770, regarding gcc-defaults: please list kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 as gcj architectures to be marked as done.

gcc-defaults_1.76_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2008-09-13 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp_4.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.3.2-1_i386.deb g++-multilib_4.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++-multilib_4.3.2-1_i386.deb g++_4.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.3.2-1_i386.deb gcc-defaults_1.76.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gc

Processing of gcc-defaults_1.76_i386.changes

2008-09-13 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-defaults_1.76_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-defaults_1.76.dsc gcc-defaults_1.76.tar.gz cpp_4.3.2-1_i386.deb gcc_4.3.2-1_i386.deb gcc-multilib_4.3.2-1_i386.deb gnat_4.3.2-1_i386.deb libgnatvsn-dev_4.3.2-1_i386.deb libgnatprj-dev_4.3.2-1

Bug#498744: marked as done (gcc -m32 seems to ignore -L flag)

2008-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:26:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#498744: gcc -m32 seems to ignore -L flag has caused the Debian Bug report #498744, regarding gcc -m32 seems to ignore -L flag to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr