LAST_UPDATED: Tue May 20 12:16:07 UTC 2008 (revision 135609)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_2byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_3_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.
Read debian/README.maintainers for instructions on how to use quilt
with gnat-4.3.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc
I'm not really sure what the correct package is for this bug (if it's
a bug). Please reassign as needed.
In researching bug #484138, I realized that gcc on arm appears to be
configured to pad structures at 32-bit boundaries. The following
program:
--
#
--- Comment #4 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-06-07 14:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=15728)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15728&action=view)
smaller testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36439
--- You are receiving this mail bec
--
dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.0-5
Severity: minor
Usertags: 3.0-quilt-by-default
To prepare a possible switch to the new source package format "3.0
(quilt)" [1], I converted all source packages and tried to rebuild them.
Unfortunately, gcc-4.3 failed, you can try yourself with those
commands (and
Package: gnat-4.3
Version: 4.3.0-6
Severity: minor
Usertags: 3.0-quilt-by-default
To prepare a possible switch to the new source package format "3.0
(quilt)" [1], I converted all source packages and tried to rebuild them.
Unfortunately, gnat-4.3 failed, you can try yourself with those
commands (an
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 02:15:38PM +0200, Wojciech Muła wrote:
> Consider this simple program:
This is not simple. Inline assembler could never be simple.
> " xorl %%ebx, %%ebx \n"
Don't use explicit register names but placeholder.
> " movzbl (%%eax
8 matches
Mail list logo