[Bug target/35658] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bad interaction on ia64 between -funroll-loops -fno-automatic -O2 and common block variable

2008-05-20 Thread kmccarty at debian dot org
--- Comment #3 from kmccarty at debian dot org 2008-05-21 03:59 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Test# 1 ( GENT ): *** failed *** > > I get this when I use -fno-automatic -O2 -funroll-loops and when I use no > optimization at all. This is with GCC 4.3 released bits and ToT bits on > a

[Bug target/35659] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2 -funroll-loops) on ia64

2008-05-20 Thread kmccarty at debian dot org
--- Comment #5 from kmccarty at debian dot org 2008-05-21 03:50 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I wonder if this is related to PR target/35695, the floating point division > bug > that Jim Wilson fixed. Could you try it with ToT or with the latest 4.3 > branch, both of which have Jim's

Bug#482122: fixed

2008-05-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: lib32ffi4 |4.3.0-3 | amd64 lib64ffi4 |4.3.0-3 | i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libffi4 |4.2.2-4 | hurd-i386 libffi4 |4.3.0-3 | alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hp

Bug#481628: libffi-bug

2008-05-20 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, how do we continue here? Is the issue "just" that the headers are being moved twice? This bug blocks testing migration of python2.5 and epiphany which is a precondition for getting gcc-4.3 and gcc-defaults moved. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

[Bug target/35659] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Miscompiled code with -O2 (but not with -O2 -funroll-loops) on ia64

2008-05-20 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #4 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-05-20 21:01 --- I wonder if this is related to PR target/35695, the floating point division bug that Jim Wilson fixed. Could you try it with ToT or with the latest 4.3 branch, both of which have Jim's fix in them. -- sje at cup dot

[Bug target/35658] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bad interaction on ia64 between -funroll-loops -fno-automatic -O2 and common block variable

2008-05-20 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #2 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-05-20 20:50 --- I cannot reproduce this error. I have compiled the test case with various options and always get output that includes Test# 1 ( C201 ): *** failed *** and Test# 1 ( GENT ): *** failed *** I get this when I use -

[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

2008-05-20 Thread pepalogik at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #109 from pepalogik at seznam dot cz 2008-05-20 16:59 --- I also encountered such problems and was going to report it as a bug in GCC... But in the GCC bug (not) reporting guide, there is fortunately a link to this page and here (comment #96) is a link to David Monniaux's pap