LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution te
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Target: s390-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Target: mipsel-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Target: mips-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libmudflap tests ===
Running target unix
=== libmudflap Summary ===
# of expected passes1799
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Run
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 20 13:12:12 UTC 2008 (revision 134483)
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
On 26/04/08 at 13:57 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> > On 26/04/08 at 01:50 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> >> Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug?
> >
> > No, gnat-4.3 still fails, but not this way (#477964).
>
> Then I suggest closing this bug and concentrating
Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:23:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#474888: #474888: gnat-4.3: FTBFS: Bootstrap comparison
failure!
has caused the Debian Bug report #474888,
regarding gnat-4.3: FTBFS: Bootstrap comparison failure!
to be marked as done.
* Ludovic Brenta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080426 14:28]:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Same thing about GCC; before making 4.3 the default on some
> > architectures I asked single members of the release team if regression
> > fixes and bug fixes were allowed after the freeze, which w
Matthias Klose writes:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
>> On 26/04/08 at 01:47 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> > severity 477964 important
>> > tags 477964 moreinfo
>> > merge 477964 465671
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > I built the package built successfully without any problem on i386 and
>> > amd64, and the bu
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
gdc | 4.1.2-19 | sparc
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be
On 26/04/08 at 10:22 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> > On 26/04/08 at 01:47 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> > > severity 477964 important
> > > tags 477964 moreinfo
> > > merge 477964 465671
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > I built the package built successfully without any problem
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 26/04/08 at 01:50 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug?
>
> No, gnat-4.3 still fails, but not this way (#477964).
Then I suggest closing this bug and concentrating on #477964. OK?
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Same thing about GCC; before making 4.3 the default on some
> architectures I asked single members of the release team if regression
> fixes and bug fixes were allowed after the freeze, which was not
> denied at this time. I don't plan to upload a new G
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Here's what I would like to suggest as acceptable for lenny (and thus
> > > 1.14.19):
> >
> > Freeze guidelines are not really up to discussion and I don't like that
> > maintainers of key packages send the signal that they don'
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 26/04/08 at 01:47 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> > severity 477964 important
> > tags 477964 moreinfo
> > merge 477964 465671
> > thanks
> >
> > I built the package built successfully without any problem on i386 and
> > amd64, and the buildds successfully on all other a
On 26/04/08 at 01:50 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Lucas, have you been able to reproduce this bug?
No, gnat-4.3 still fails, but not this way (#477964).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
On 26/04/08 at 01:47 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> severity 477964 important
> tags 477964 moreinfo
> merge 477964 465671
> thanks
>
> I built the package built successfully without any problem on i386 and
> amd64, and the buildds successfully on all other architectures. Two
> days ago.
>
> Sin
18 matches
Mail list logo
