Szia!
Az ország legnagyobb warez letöltőhelye vár mindenkit!
több 100 Premier film közül választhatsz, de
megtalálhatod kedvenc játékaid, sorozataid is...
több terra kiváló minőségű warezt találhatsz nálunk, profin, crc és
egyéb hiba nélkül, megbízható sávszélességgel tölthetsz le.
Válaszd ki a
Great experiences in bed start with this.
http://www.sonstui.com/
Re: Coming over
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be a tiger in bed and show her a real animal time.
http://www.asestio.com/
Re: The truth about orgasms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LAST_UPDATED:
Target: powerpc-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.3.1 20080321 (prerelease) (Debian 4.3.0-2)
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
=== libjava Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes2550
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 23 14:12:16 UTC 2008 (revision 133461)
Target: i486-linux-gnu
gcc version 4.4.0 20080323 (experimental) [trunk revision 133461] (Debian
20080323-1)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2315
# of
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes1389
# of unsupported tests 10
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
FAI
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: TestClosureGC run
FAIL: pr11951 run
FAIL: natgetargssize.cc compilation
FAIL: natgetlocalvartable.cc compilation
FAIL: natgetstacktrace.cc compilation
FAIL: natevents.cc
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 08:46:15PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > THe _BEST_ example of that are buildd's that for now run etch (even
> > some sarge not so long time ago) and have a sid chroot to build. Not
> > keeping the CLD patch means that we break our own buildd infrastructure.
> > Yay.
>
Matthias Klose, le Sun 23 Mar 2008 17:35:40 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault writes:
> > Package: gcc-4.3
> > Version: 4.3.0-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > gcc-4.3 currently FTBFS because of differing symbol lists:
>
> please recheck with updated files in the packaging reposi
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080323 21:39]:
> > > This will last up to the lenny release, and the toolchain is to be
> > > freezed next week. So I don't ...
> > ... think you'll have to support that patch actively for too long.
>
> wrong, once released with the patch you'll get bug re
> > This will last up to the lenny release, and the toolchain is to be
> > freezed next week. So I don't ...
> ... think you'll have to support that patch actively for too long.
wrong, once released with the patch you'll get bug reports for the
compiler with the patch applied. For every repor
> > IMO the current opinions "Isn't it risky", "I second that" only look
> > for the risk of running an unfixed kernel (if at all), not of shipping
> > a compiler diverting in code generation from upstream.
>
> I'm sure all of this is because of the CLD patch:
> 1,5M gcc-4.2-4.2.3/debian/patches
> THe _BEST_ example of that are buildd's that for now run etch (even
> some sarge not so long time ago) and have a sid chroot to build. Not
> keeping the CLD patch means that we break our own buildd infrastructure.
> Yay.
No, this is not an argument. If a buildd is used to build packages for
m
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:41:59PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 04:54:29PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:15:11AM +, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for
> > > > lenny+1 to reve
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 04:54:29PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:15:11AM +, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for
> > > lenny+1 to revert this ?
> >
> > I second that, please don't revert the patch until l
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 08:23:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> What about fixing the etch kernel?
The kernel will get fixed.
Bastian
--
Each kiss is as the first.
-- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, "The Paradise Syndrome",
stardate 4842.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:23:10PM +, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit:
>
> >> Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for
> >> lenny+1 to revert this ?
> >
> > I second that, please don't revert the patch until lenny+1. FWIW I
> > believe the release team
Watch Britney moan and cry in pleasure and ecstasy.
http://www.alogigubm.com/
Stick To What Works
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Pierre Habouzit:
>> Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for
>> lenny+1 to revert this ?
>
> I second that, please don't revert the patch until lenny+1. FWIW I
> believe the release team as a whole wanted the patch to be kept as well,
> but I'll let the other membe
The gcc-4.3 distribution removes backward compatible include files,
pre-iso header files that a large number of legacy C++ packages rely
on. I'm wondering why such a major disruption in backward
compatibility wasn't reserved for gcc-5.0. And I'm also wondering why
the gcc packagers at Deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gfortran-multilib_4.3.0-1_powerpc.deb: package says priority is optional,
override says standard.
gfortran-multilib_4.3.0-1_sparc.deb: package says priority is optional,
override says sta
Accepted:
cpp_4.3.0-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.3.0-1_powerpc.deb
cpp_4.3.0-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.3.0-1_sparc.deb
g++-multilib_4.3.0-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++-multilib_4.3.0-1_powerpc.deb
g++-multilib_4.3.0-1_sparc.deb
to pool
gcc-defaults_1.66_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
g++_4.3.0-1_powerpc.deb
gobjc++-multilib_4.3.0-1_powerpc.deb
gpc_2.1-4.1.2-16_sparc.deb
g++-multilib_4.3.0-1_powerpc.deb
gobjc++_4.3.0-1_sparc.deb
libgnatprj-dev_4.3-4_sparc.deb
gnat_4.3-4_powerpc
Be well hung, thick and muscular within just weeks.
http://www.Hithergspots.com/
Satisfaction Matters Most
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:15:11AM +, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:02:22PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Matthias Klose writes:
> > > > For all ports besides alpha and hppa we plan to make GCC-4.3 the
> > > > default compilers for lenny.
> > >=20
> > > amd64 and i386
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Package: gcc-4.3
> Version: 4.3.0-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hello,
>
> gcc-4.3 currently FTBFS because of differing symbol lists:
please recheck with updated files in the packaging repository.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:15:11AM +, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:02:22PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Matthias Klose writes:
> > > For all ports besides alpha and hppa we plan to make GCC-4.3 the
> > > default compilers for lenny.
> >
> > amd64 and i386 side note: the
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.0-1
Severity: important
Hello,
gcc-4.3 currently FTBFS because of differing symbol lists:
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libstdc++6/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match
completely debian/libstdc++6.symbols.hurd-i386
--- dpkg-gensymbols2oOICF 2008-03-23 13:51:10.77
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:02:22PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Matthias Klose writes:
> > For all ports besides alpha and hppa we plan to make GCC-4.3 the
> > default compilers for lenny.
>
> amd64 and i386 side note: the gcc-4.3 4.3.0-2 upload has a patch
> reenabling the cld instruction when
29 matches
Mail list logo
