Processed: change submitter to my @d.o address

2008-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 466948 ! Bug#466948: gfortran-4.3: miscompiled code with -O2 on ia64 Changed Bug submitter from "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#466948: gfortran-4.3: miscompiled code with -O2 on ia64

2008-02-21 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Package: gfortran-4.3 Version: 4.3-20080202-1 Severity: normal Hi Matthias, sorry to pester you with yet another one of these! I'll just make this one a brief placeholder, so that the issue has a Debian bug number and so that I remember to report it upstream later. There is apparently an additi

gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_s390.changes ACCEPTED

2008-02-21 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gnat-4.3-base_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb to pool/main/g/gnat-4.3/gnat-4.3-base_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb to pool/main/g/gnat-4.3/gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb libgnat-4.3-dbg_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb to pool/main/g/gnat-4.3/libgnat-4.3-dbg_4.3-20080202

gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

2008-02-21 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gnat-4.3-base_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gnat-4.3/gnat-4.3-base_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gnat-4.3/gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb libgnat-4.3-dbg_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gnat-4.3/libgnat-4.3-dbg_4.3-20080202

Bug#465580: gcc-4.2: FTBFS: ../../src/gcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c:96: error: size of array 'st_space' is too large

2008-02-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 18/02/08 at 07:21 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > tag 465580 + unreproducible > thanks > > Lucas Nussbaum writes: > > On 14/02/08 at 14:40 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > you were not able to reproduce this the last time. Why file it again? > > > > Erm, seems that last time, another package

Bug#382746: The latest Apple OS eFnb

2008-02-21 Thread ethelred weiping
Buying Cheap OEM is very good for pricing and function. http://hildamazyckdx.blogspot.com That is really cheap and great for using s0f1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.changes

2008-02-21 Thread Archive Administrator
gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnat-4.3-base_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb libgnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb libgnatvsn4.3-dev_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb libgnatvsn4.3_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb libgnatprj4.3-dev_4.3-20080202-1_hppa.deb

Processing of gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_s390.changes

2008-02-21 Thread Archive Administrator
gnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnat-4.3-base_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb libgnat-4.3_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb libgnatvsn4.3-dev_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb libgnatvsn4.3_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb libgnatprj4.3-dev_4.3-20080202-1_s390.deb

Re: Cross compiler issues

2008-02-21 Thread Matthias Klose
Hector Oron writes: > Nevermind, > > Answering myself, it should be at > /debian/tmp/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnu/4.3.0/include-fixed/syslimits.h > > There is some bug to be fixed. I'll submit a patch as soon as i fix it. thanks, yes, I'm not sure that 4.3 was already sucessfully used to build

Bug#466911: gfortran-4.3: (regression) bad interaction on ia64 between -funroll-loops -fno-automatic -O2 and common block variable

2008-02-21 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Package: gfortran-4.3 Version: 4.3-20080202-1 Severity: normal Hi, In porting CERNLIB to gfortran, I've found an apparent gfortran compiler bug that results in incorrect code on ia64 (Itanium) with the compiler flags -funroll-loops -fno-automatic -O2 (or higher), possibly due to a bad interaction

Re: Cross compiler issues

2008-02-21 Thread Hector Oron
Nevermind, Answering myself, it should be at /debian/tmp/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnu/4.3.0/include-fixed/syslimits.h There is some bug to be fixed. I'll submit a patch as soon as i fix it. Regards 2008/2/21, Hector Oron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > Trying to fix gcc-4.3 cross compiler

Cross compiler issues

2008-02-21 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, Trying to fix gcc-4.3 cross compiler builds i found this error: dh_movefiles: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated. dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnu/4.3.0/include/README not found (supposed to put it in gcc-4.3-arm-linux-gnu) dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/gcc

[Bug cp-tools/35111] rmic fails: no resource templates/Stub.jav

2008-02-21 Thread gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
-- gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |0.97 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35111 --

Bug#466836: gnat-4.2 - FTBFS: a-exexda.adb:271:10: violation of implicit restriction "No_Recursion"

2008-02-21 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: gnat-4.2 Version: 4.2.3-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gnat-4.2_4.2.3-1 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by > sbuild/s390 98 [...] >-I- -I. -Iada -I../../src/gcc/ada ../../src/gcc/ada/memtrack.adb -o > ada/memtrac

[Bug cp-tools/35111] rmic fails: no resource templates/Stub.jav

2008-02-21 Thread gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
--- Comment #3 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-21 10:43 --- Created an attachment (id=15190) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15190&action=view) Patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35111 --- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug cp-tools/35111] rmic fails: no resource templates/Stub.jav

2008-02-21 Thread gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
--- Comment #2 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-02-21 10:43 --- Fixed in CVS. Closing. -- gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/28319] sentinel attribute should support non-NULL sentinels

2008-02-21 Thread ludo at gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ludo at gnu dot org 2008-02-21 09:00 --- (In reply to comment #1) > The only time I can think this comes up is that the sentinel is -1. As another example, GNU Guile has a number of variadic functions (e.g., `scm_list_n ()') whose sentinel is `SCM_UNDEFINED' (which h