* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-22 08:00]:
> Upstream writes:
>
> | I view this as a critical "target" bug. However, if we find a fix, I
> | don't think it should be applied to 4.2 and earlier since it's very likely
> | to break something else.
Seems like he applied the patch to
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-21 11:15]:
> > It is worth noting that while producing an ICE on -O2, it works fine
> > on -O0, -O1 and -Os.
> Upstream's initial reponse was that it's "doubtful there will be a
> quick fix for this", so I suggest you put in a workaround into your
> p
--- Comment #15 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-10 03:27
---
Fixed by change.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #22 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-10 03:26
---
Fixed by patch.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #21 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-10 03:17
---
Subject: Bug 34091
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Dec 10 03:17:24 2007
New Revision: 130735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130735
Log:
PR middle-end/32889
PR target/34091
--- Comment #14 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-10 03:17
---
Subject: Bug 32889
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Dec 10 03:17:24 2007
New Revision: 130735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130735
Log:
PR middle-end/32889
PR target/34091
Package: gdc-4.1
Version: 0.25-4.1.2-17d1
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Your package fails to build with GCC 4.3. Version 4.3 has not been
released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors
and give people an advance warning. GCC 4.3 has converted a number
of warnings into errors.
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
>>> I'm ok with a
>>> supplementary specific check for building of a cross-compiler, but not
>>> with a generic check like testing the ARCH environment variable.
>> OK, I have a solution for that - replace $ARCH with $GCC_TARGET.
>>
4.1 (4.1.2-18) unstable; urgency=low
.
[Matthias Klose]
* Update to the gcc-4_1-branch 20071209.
- Fix PR middle-end/34130, wrong code with some __builtin_abs expressions.
Closes: #452113.
* debian/rules2 (STAGE1_CFLAGS): Fix build failure on m68k.
* Don't run the testsuite on hpp
files)
libstdc++6-4.1-pic - The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (shared library subset
kit)
treelang-4.1 - The GNU Treelang compiler
Closes: 433539 452113
Changes:
gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-18) unstable; urgency=low
.
[Matthias Klose]
* Update to the gcc-4_1-branch 20071209.
- Fix PR middle-end/
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-18_i386.deb: package says priority is required, override
says optional.
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-18_sparc.deb: package says priority is required, override
says optional.
Eit
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1.2-18_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-18_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1.2-18_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1.2-18_sparc.deb
g++-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-18_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/g++-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-18_i386.deb
g++-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-18_sparc.deb
gcc-4.1_4.1.2-18_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lib64objc1_4.1.2-18_i386.deb
gcc-4.1_4.1.2-18.dsc
gobjc++-4.1-multilib_4.1.2-18_sparc.deb
gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-18_i386.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.1.2-18_sparc.deb
libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.2-18_sparc.deb
gob
--- Comment #20 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-09 21:31 ---
Fixed for 4.3 then.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary
--- Comment #19 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-12-09
20:39 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at
postreload.c:392
> Can this be closed now? Should the testcase (e.g. the #c3 one) go into the
> testsuite?
I'm still pondering w
--- Comment #18 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-09 19:50 ---
Can this be closed now? Should the testcase (e.g. the #c3 one) go into the
testsuite?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34091
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
forwarded 455199 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33832
thanks
* Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-09 19:54]:
> I'll add my comment.
Thanks Olaf.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Dec 9, 2007 7:21 PM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-09 10:23]:
> > is deprecated in 4.3, but it's replacement,
> > doesn't appeart to be available in 4.2. Using
> > doesn't sound like a good plan (at the moment), so
> > wouldn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 455199 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33832
Bug#455199: g++-4.3: deprecated in 4.3, but replacement not
available in 4.2
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR33832.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
* Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-09 10:23]:
> is deprecated in 4.3, but it's replacement,
> doesn't appeart to be available in 4.2. Using
> doesn't sound like a good plan (at the moment), so
> wouldn't it make sense to postpone the deprecation until it's
> replacement has been a
--- Comment #13 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-09 18:02
---
Subject: Bug 32889
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Dec 9 18:02:08 2007
New Revision: 130725
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130725
Log:
PR middle-end/32889
PR target/34091
--- Comment #17 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-09 18:02
---
Subject: Bug 34091
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Dec 9 18:02:08 2007
New Revision: 130725
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130725
Log:
PR middle-end/32889
PR target/34091
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> > I'm ok with a
> > supplementary specific check for building of a cross-compiler, but not
> > with a generic check like testing the ARCH environment variable.
>
> OK, I have a solution for that - replace $ARCH with $GCC_TARGET.
>
> I've tested with thi
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
>> Emdebian cannot build, patch or test every permutation of toolchain that
>> people need so this isn't about "us" patching locally, it is about
>> lowering the barrier to cross building on Debian by not forcing every
>> user to pa
Your message dated Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:50:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445793: orbit2cpp: FTBFS: CosNaming-cpp-common.cc:715:
internal compiler error: in reference_to_unused, at dwarf2out.c:10010
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This mea
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> Emdebian cannot build, patch or test every permutation of toolchain that
> people need so this isn't about "us" patching locally, it is about
> lowering the barrier to cross building on Debian by not forcing every
> user to patch locally. This is why we a
Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ I don't have a real opinion yet on the initial patch and this
> changes proposed, will try to get to this on Sunday. ]
OK, thanks, Guillem. I'd like to get this resolved asap.
> On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 19:01:14 +, Neil Williams wrote:
>> Raphael Hertzog wrote
Package: g++-4.3
Version: 4.3-20071130-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
is deprecated in 4.3, but it's replacement,
doesn't appeart to be available in 4.2.
Using doesn't sound like a good plan (at the moment), so
wouldn't it make sense to postpone the deprecation until it's replacement has
been avail
Hi,
[ I don't have a real opinion yet on the initial patch and this
changes proposed, will try to get to this on Sunday. ]
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 19:01:14 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
> >> My first patch did exactly that - and
29 matches
Mail list logo
