[Bug c++/6634] wrong parsing of "long long double"

--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 02:35 --- *** Bug 32888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/32888] Declared long long double has wrong type

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 02:35 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6634 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Bug#433172: gcc-4.2: probably different issue

Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2.1-0 Followup-For: Bug #433172 Hi, while the patch indeed hides the problem, the real issue seems to be deeper. Being listed in ssp_no_archs has an effect on the build process of the bootstrap(!) compiler; my guess is that ARM is listed there because building a cross

Results for 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-0) libjava testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jul 19 15:44:56 UTC 2007 (revision 126787) Target: s390-linux-gnu gcc version 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-0) Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix === libjava Summary for unix === # of expected passes

Results for 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-0) libjava testsuite on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jul 19 15:44:56 UTC 2007 (revision 126787) Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix WARNING: program timed out. FAIL: pr11951 run FAIL: natgetargssize.cc compilation FAIL: natgetlocalvartable.cc compilation FAIL:

Results for 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-0) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jul 19 15:44:56 UTC 2007 (revision 126787) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libffi tests === Running target unix FAIL: libffi.call/cls_1_1byte.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test FAIL: libffi.call/cls_5_1_byte.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 1

Results for 4.1.3 20070718 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-14) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Wed Jul 18 17:04:05 UTC 2007 (revision 126723) Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libmudflap tests === Running target unix === libmudflap Summary === # of expected passes1799 === libstdc++ tests === Run

Bug#431454: marked as done (gcc-snapshot - FTBFS: gcj-4.1: command not found)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:24:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-snapshot - FTBFS: gcj-4.1: command not found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

[Bug java/32862] bug in EnumMap implementation

--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at developer dot classpath dot org 2007-07-24 15:27 --- Subject: Bug 32862 CVSROOT:/cvsroot/classpath Module name:classpath Changes by: Tom Tromey 07/07/24 15:26:36 Modified files: . : ChangeLog java/uti

Bug#423383: marked as done (gcj-4.2: compilation fails; libgcj.spec not found)

Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:05:38 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423383: gcj-4.2: compilation fails; libgcj.spec not found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: Re: gij-4.1: Runs out of memory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 433391 grave Bug#433391: gij-4.1: Runs out of memory Severity set to `grave' from `serious' > clone 433391 -1 Bug#433391: gij-4.1: Runs out of memory Bug 433391 cloned as bug 434484. > reassign -1 glibc Bug#434484: gij-4.1: Runs out of memory

Bug#433391: gij-4.1: Runs out of memory

severity 433391 grave clone 433391 -1 reassign -1 glibc block 433391 by -1 thanks Building gcj or gcc-snapshot on a system downgraded to glibc-2.5 doesn't show the testsuite failures in libjava. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA