[Bug tree-optimization/32589] [4.3 regression] exp_dbug.adb:981: error: invalid array index

2007-07-10 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |

Bug#432489: the offending line

2007-07-10 Thread Max Alekseyev
This is the offending line in the assembler code produced by gcc-4.2: leal -1(%esi),20(%esp) It indeed contains "too many memory references". Regards, Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Results for 4.1.3 20070629 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-13) testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2007-07-10 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jun 29 21:32:09 UTC 2007 (revision 126124) Target: x86_64-linux-gnu gcc version 4.1.3 20070629 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-13) Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix XPASS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times

Bug#432604: internal compiler error when building latest util-linux

2007-07-10 Thread Roderich Schupp
Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2-20070707-1 Severity: important Trying to build util-linux 2.13~rc1-0: ... gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -include ../config.h -I../include -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -fsigned-char -g -O2 -MT fsck.minix.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/fsck.minix.Tpo -c -o fsck.

Bug#432599: gcc-4.2: Spurious warning building amd64 binaries on i386

2007-07-10 Thread Mark Brown
Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2-20070707-1 Severity: important Attempting to build even the most basic amd64 binaries generate a spurious warning on i386: | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ cat foo.c | int main(void) | { | return 0; | } | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ gcc-4.1 -m64 foo.c -o foo | [EMAIL PR

Bug#432489: gcc-4.2: error when compiling kernel 2.6.22: Error: too many memory references for `lea'

2007-07-10 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 432489 + needsinfo thanks please attach the preprocessed source and the command used to build the file. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#432489: gcc-4.2: error when compiling kernel 2.6.22: Error: too many memory references for `lea'

2007-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 432489 + needsinfo Unknown tag/s: needsinfo. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l

Bug#432489: Downgrading helps

2007-07-10 Thread Thomas Luzat
I encounter exactly the same problem on my unstable/experimental machine with 2.6.22-rc7-git3 and 2.6.22 (only ones tested). Downgrading all gcc-4.2 packages to 4.2-20070627-1 helps, so it seems to have been introduced in between 4.2-20070627-1 and 4.2-20070707-1. Cheers, Thomas Luzat -- To UN

Bug#428509: gcc-4.1 post 4.1.2-8 breaks glibc compilation

2007-07-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:50:11PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > Was this bug in gcc or glibc (or both)? I still don't really know, but I know the patch I used fixes the problem. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engine

Bug#428509: gcc-4.1 post 4.1.2-8 breaks glibc compilation

2007-07-10 Thread Touko Korpela
Was this bug in gcc or glibc (or both)? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#432525: gnat-4.2 - FTBFS: Unfullfillable build dependency: gcc-4.2-source

2007-07-10 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Yes, I just noticed. This is because gnat-4.2 spent a few days in the NEW queue and in the mean time a new version of gcc-4.2 landed in unstable. I'll upload an update soon. -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Bug#432525: gnat-4.2 - FTBFS: Unfullfillable build dependency: gcc-4.2-source

2007-07-10 Thread Bastian Blank
nal.) > debconf: falling back to frontend: Readline > debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Readline > debconf: (This frontend requires a controlling tty.) > debconf: falling back to frontend: Teletype > Removing libgnatvsn4.1 ... > Purging configuration files for libgnatvsn4.1 ... > Removing libgnat-4.1 ... >

Bug#428509: marked as done (gcc-4.1 post 4.1.2-8 breaks glibc compilation)

2007-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429487: fixed in glibc 2.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#429487: marked as done (glibc_2.6-0exp3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: undefined reference to `__librt_multiple_threads')

2007-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429487: fixed in glibc 2.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#428509: marked as done (gcc-4.1 post 4.1.2-8 breaks glibc compilation)

2007-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428509: fixed in glibc 2.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#429487: marked as done (glibc_2.6-0exp3(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: undefined reference to `__librt_multiple_threads')

2007-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#428509: fixed in glibc 2.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

[Bug tree-optimization/32589] [4.3 Regression] exp_dbug.adb:981: error: invalid array index

2007-07-10 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||32713 nThis|| http://gcc

Bug#432489: gcc-4.2: error when compiling kernel 2.6.22: Error: too many memory references for `lea'

2007-07-10 Thread Max
Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2-20070707-1 Severity: normal I unable to compile released kernel 2.6.22 with gcc-4.2: gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 20070707 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2-20070707-1) The compilation ends up with the following error: CC fs/binfmt_misc.o