[Bug libstdc++/32509] [4.2 4.3 regression] unable to explicitely configure with a given locale model

--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-06-26 23:44 --- Yes, today, while offline, I realized that in fact the real issue here was the fix for 31717 not completely ok for everyone. And we already got a report of this type before (upon it I decided to clarify the documentation, w

Al-Manahel Newsletter List Unsubscription

The removal of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Date of this removal: Mon Jun 25 22:27:26 2007 Please save this email message for future reference. --

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #428814 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26374 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 428814 + status-NEW t

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #413351 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30563 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote reso

[bts-link] source package gnat-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #416973 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31415 # * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> RESOLVED # * remote resol

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #403596 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29478 # * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGNED usertags 403596 - sta

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #421354 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31733 # * remote status changed: REOPENED -> RESOLVED # * remote reso

gcc-4.2 4.2-20070609-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the gcc-4.2 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.2-20070528-1 Current version: 4.2-20070609-1 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more inf

Bug#430688: gcc-4.2 FTBFS when cross compiling because of wrong config path in

Package: gcc-4.2 Version: 4.2-20070609 Hello, This patch fixes the following issues when cross compiling: * Merge DEB_CROSS_INDEPENDENT with DEB_CROSS * Disables libssp0 for arm and armel targets when cross compiling * Updates README.cross * Fixes linker mapping problem on binary-libstdcxx-cros

[Bug libstdc++/32509] [4.1 regression ?] fails to link using -O

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |

Re: Reverting r2000 for gcc-4.2

Ludovic Brenta writes: > Matthias Klose writes: > > I'll revert this checkin on the 4.2 branch. Without it we only apply > > and test the patches for specific builds and architectures. This > > then tends to be discovered on the build daemons, which is late. > > Adjusting the build dependencies is