gnat-4.1 4.1.1-19 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the gnat-4.1 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.1.1-16 Current version: 4.1.1-19 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

gcc-4.0 4.0.3-7 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the gcc-4.0 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.0.3-3 Current version: 4.0.3-7 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. --

Welcome to Al-Manahel Newsletter List

The subscription of the email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To the mailing list: Al-Manahel Newsletter List is all set. Thanks for subscribing! Date of this subscription: Fri Nov 10 14:17:21 2006 Please save this email message for future reference. -

Our understanding is that

Earlier this year we wrote to you about our Knowledge Based Degree Program (KBDP). We thought we would follow up and see if there is any reason why you have not called our registrars office. Most people don't realize that these degrees are completely valid, and only our staff and yourself know

Bug#181096: [Bug tree-optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l&2) l|=2 away

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||29797 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 --- You

Bug#387875: Patch for ARM gcj

Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Riku Voipio writes: > > > tags 387875 +patch > > > thanks > > > > > > Verified that gcj-4.1 builds with this patch, and with patched version > > > ecj-bootstrap build fine as well. > > > > just to clar

Bug#280803: Removing GFDL'ed docs from gcc-4.0 packages

Frank =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=BCster?= writes: > Hi Matthias, > > what's up with these bugs (280803 and 321780, 321781, 321782)? Can you > provide the patches you used to split out the docs from gcc-4.1? I > think we would need the patches corresponding to these changelog > entries: > > gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds

Bug#387875: Patch for ARM gcj

On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:59:20PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Riku Voipio writes: > > tags 387875 +patch > > thanks > > > > Verified that gcj-4.1 builds with this patch, and with patched version > > ecj-bootstrap build fine as well. > > just to clarify, could you verify, that packages using g

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #394630 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27891 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED usertags 394630 + status-A

[bts-link] source package gcj-4.1

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #392791 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29547 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution cha

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.2

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #351786 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16006 # * remote status changed: REOPENED -> ASSIGNED usertags 351786 - sta

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #395162 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29585 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 395162 + status-N

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #86251 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR3511 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report f

Processed: tagging 280803

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22 > # sigh, bug hidden due to wrong tags :/ > tags 280803 - sid Bug#280803: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.2olisfcbc] contains non-free documentation Tags were: sid sarge-ignore Tags removed: sid >

Bug#280803: Removing GFDL'ed docs from gcc-4.0 packages

Hi Matthias, what's up with these bugs (280803 and 321780, 321781, 321782)? Can you provide the patches you used to split out the docs from gcc-4.1? I think we would need the patches corresponding to these changelog entries: gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds1-12) unstable; urgency=medium [Matthias Klose] [..