FYI: The status of the gcj-4.1 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.1.1-13
Current version: 4.1.1-17
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--- Comment #8 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 21:47 ---
I'm not sure, but I think that our hppa port hasn't switched over yet.
As for ARM, I'm not sure what to do to fix the issue. ARM old ABI is stuck
with SJLJ. And the EABI can't implement _Unwind_Backtrace either. I h
--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-11-06
21:09 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] gcj-dbtool segfaults
> Ranjit's patch to enable prologue analysis on i386 changed the behavior for
> other SJLJ targets. They used to call the no-op fallback_backtrace fr
--- Comment #8 from pepster at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-11-06
20:34 ---
I spent a considerable amount of my personal time on open source projects, so I
am not particularily ashamed of not fixing this bug myself (I tried, but gave
up after I realized the learnign curve is too
Please give us a call to see if we can help you qualify for the degree you are
interested in.
For the next 2 weeks we will be qualifying select applicants based on 2
Criterion:
Criteria for our Degree program:
1. Have the work experience
Or
2. Already have a degree and
--- Comment #7 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-11-06 19:51 ---
I think 4.3 will be released on 2007 or early 2008. Fixing bugs on 4.2 and 4.3
will speed up things, of course.
In addition, anyone could take the patches and apply them to their preferred
stable version. I think the
--- Comment #6 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 19:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=12553)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12553&action=view)
Potential patch.
This hasn't been tested yet; when it has I can add a changelog and post it.
That's in progress n
> Yes, libc6-i386 is the package that "owns" /usr/lib32, so I believe this is
> a bug in lib32gfortran0. It looks like this bug can be fixed for etch
> simply by letting the new version of gcc-4.0 in, which no longer builds
> lib32gfortran0 at all; the lib32gfortran1 package from gcc-4.1 does not
--- Comment #6 from pepster at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-11-06
18:49 ---
4 years to agree there is an issue here. maybe we will have a fix in 2010.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Comment #5 from jaco at kroon dot co dot za 2006-11-06 18:21 ---
I'm refering to the response to the bug, not the actual fix. I've had the
"priviledge" of filing bugs against other projects where I forgot about the bug
by the time somebody responded (two years down the line). I rec
--- Comment #4 from pepster at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-11-06
17:45 ---
Quick response? you must be joking. I reported this in "Opened: 2002-05-09
14:46" against 2.95.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 390199 serious
Bug#390199: Unsatisfied on hppa
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> retitle 390199 ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE
Bug#390199: Unsatisfied on hppa
Changed Bug title.
> clone 390199 -1
Bug#390199: ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE
B
severity 390199 serious
retitle 390199 ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa: ICE
clone 390199 -1
reassign -1 gcc-4.1
# probably there's an underlying code error in ptex-bin?
severity -1 important
thanks
The latest upstream version of ptex-bin FTBFS on hppa:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=pte
--- Comment #3 from jaco at kroon dot co dot za 2006-11-06 16:46 ---
Awesome. That would be a good move. The implicit conversions are very handy
for catching certain types of bugs early one, however, the function prototype
thing is a pain.
Unfortunately I won't be able to assist with
--- Comment #2 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-11-06 16:30 ---
(a bit more explanation won't hurt)
The GCC documentation says:
-Wconversion: Warn if a prototype causes a type conversion that is different
from what would happen to the same argument in the absence of a prototype.
--- Comment #10 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-11-06 13:55 ---
*** Bug 29739 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-11-06 13:55 ---
The warning works as intended.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6614 ***
--
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 397276 lib32gfortran0
Bug#397276: libc6-i386: file conflicts with lib32gfortran0
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-i386' to `lib32gfortran0'.
> found 397276 lib32gfortran0 4.0.3-3
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
S
19 matches
Mail list logo
