Bug#379886: marked as done ([ia64] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:17:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#379886: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20060922-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#381176: marked as done ([ia64] switch statement points to unreferenced label at -O2)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:17:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381176: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20060922-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#379885: marked as done ([ia64] ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:17:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#379885: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20060922-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#385342: marked as done (ICE: tree check: did not expect class 'type', have 'type' (template_type_parm) in contains_placeholder_p, at tree.c:2223)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:17:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385342: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20060922-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#387368: marked as done (ICE: verify_stmts failed - invalid operand to unary operator OggFLAC__MAPPING_VERSION_MINORD.3161)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:17:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387368: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20060922-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#387271: marked as done (tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:17:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387271: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20060922-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#381384: marked as done ([gnat] ICE in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5513)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:17:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381384: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20060922-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#387257: marked as done (ICE: verify_stmts failed (invalid operand to unary operator ""[0];))

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:17:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387257: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20060922-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

gcc-snapshot_20060922-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20060922-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060922-1.diff.gz gcc-snapshot_20060922-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060922-1.dsc gcc-snapshot_20060922-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060922-1_amd64.deb gcc-snapsh

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1

2006-09-22 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #380121 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21299 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> NEW usertags 380121 - status-A

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-09-22 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #381176 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28574 # * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED # * remote resolutio

[bts-link] source package gnat-4.1

2006-09-22 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gnat-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #388560 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR15305 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # * remote resolution ch

Re: gfdl gcc documentation packages for non-free: update

2006-09-22 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 21, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - the man pages (all except gfortran.1) are not built from >source. -> RC As long as the source is available in the package this is not a bug at all. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#370105: marked as done ([mips] ICE in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:39:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060912-1 (source amd64) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#385513: marked as done (rejects valid arrays)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:39:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060912-1 (source amd64) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#385339: marked as done (ICE in compare_name_with_value, at tree-vrp.c:3557)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:39:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060912-1 (source amd64) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#385182: marked as done (c++: rejects VLA in template class's member with using)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:39:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060912-1 (source amd64) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#385306: marked as done (ICE: gimplification failed, c++)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:39:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060912-1 (source amd64) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#382950: marked as done ([s390] in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:39:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060912-1 (source amd64) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#383283: marked as done ([powerpc] in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:39:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060912-1 (source amd64) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#383848: marked as done (ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776)

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:39:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Accepted gcc-snapshot 20060912-1 (source amd64) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Re: gfdl gcc documentation packages for non-free: update

2006-09-22 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: > > Hello. > > > > I've updated gcc-4.1 documentation packages (Section: non-free/doc). > > Packages are no longer debian-native, also several issues have been > > fixed. > > > > Also, I've created gcc-doc-defaults package (Section: contrib/doc) > > that builds gcc-

Processing of gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds1-13+b1_arm.changes

2006-09-22 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.1_4.1.1ds1-13+b1_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-4.1-base_4.1.1-13+b1_arm.deb libgcc1_4.1.1-13+b1_arm.deb cpp-4.1_4.1.1-13+b1_arm.deb protoize_4.1.1-13+b1_arm.deb fixincludes_4.1.1-13+b1_arm.deb libmudflap0_4.1.1-13+b1_arm.deb libmudflap0

Processing of gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13_m68k.changes

2006-09-22 Thread Archive Administrator
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-13_m68k.deb gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13_m68k.deb gij-4.1_4.1.1-13_m68k.deb libgcj7-0_4.1.1-13_m68k.deb libgcj7-awt_4.1.1-13_m68k.deb gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-13_m68k.deb libgcj7-dev_4.1.1-13_

Processed: will be fixed in next upload

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 379885 + pending Bug#379885: [ia64] ICE in ia64_expand_move, at config/ia64/ia64.c:1088 Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream Tags added: pending > tags 379886 + pending Bug#379886: [ia64] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2448 Tags were: fixed-upst

Re: gfdl gcc documentation packages for non-free: update

2006-09-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 21 septembre 2006 à 14:32 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > - build-depend on gcc-4.1-source (including the -doc patches), >build the package (bootstrap_target=all), then just package >the documentation. If the source packages still contain some GFDL documents, then this is a RC

Processed: your mail

2006-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 388596 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29178 Bug#388596: gcj-4.1: CharsetEncoder.canEncode() gives different results than Sun version Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

Re: gfdl gcc documentation packages for non-free: update

2006-09-22 Thread Matthias Klose
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes: > Hello. > > I've updated gcc-4.1 documentation packages (Section: non-free/doc). > Packages are no longer debian-native, also several issues have been fixed. > > Also, I've created gcc-doc-defaults package (Section: contrib/doc) that > builds gcc-doc, cpp-doc, gfor