Processing of gcc-4.2_4.2-20060905-1_multi.changes

2006-09-05 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-4.2_4.2-20060905-1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcj-4.2-base_4.2-20060905-1_powerpc.deb gij-4.2_4.2-20060905-1_hppa.deb libstdc++6-4.2-pic_4.2-20060905-1_hppa.deb libgcj8-awt_4.2-20060905-1_hppa.deb gcc-4.2-base_4.2-20060905-1_powerpc.deb

Bug#386228: libgcj7-0 (and by extension libgcj7) packaged such that conflicts are inevitable

2006-09-05 Thread Don Armstrong
Package: libgcj7-0 Severity: important Version: 4.1.1-13 libgcj7-0 (and by extension libgcj7) are packaged such that any soname increment will result in the old versions of libgcj no longer being installable unless the gcj version is also incremented. First: usr/share/doc/gcj-4.1-base/NEWS.gz

gcc-4.2_4.2-20060905-1_multi.changes is NEW

2006-09-05 Thread Debian Installer
cpp-4.2-doc_4.2-20060905-1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2-doc_4.2-20060905-1_all.deb cpp-4.2_4.2-20060905-1_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2_4.2-20060905-1_hppa.deb cpp-4.2_4.2-20060905-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/cpp-4.2_4.2-20060905-1_i386.deb cpp-4.2_4.2-20060905

Re: kernel build dependency on gcc-4.0?

2006-09-05 Thread Paul Slootman
On Tue 05 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:54:11AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > The alpha maintainer said, gcc-4.1 is not capable to build the linux > > kernel, the same applies to m68k. Any other architecture can use it. > > hppa just did not switch on the last ab

Re: kernel build dependency on gcc-4.0?

2006-09-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:54:11AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Will gcc-4.0 be dropped as a build dependency for etch, or be kept? > The alpha maintainer said, gcc-4.1 is not capable to build the linux > kernel, the same applies

Bug#386180: gcc-4.1: manpage sentence missing period

2006-09-05 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-10 Severity: minor -Wunused-variable Warn whenever a local variable or non-constant static variable is unused aside from its declaration This warning is enabled by -Wall. ^^^ -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#386174: gcc-4.1: gcc sometimes doesn't recognize uninitialized variables

2006-09-05 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.1-10 Severity: normal In the following program, gcc fails to recognize that "n" is uninitialized, unless the "sscanf" line is commented out. I expected no change at all, since sscanf() is called after foo(). Since the compiler is responsible for guaranteeing that th

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

2006-09-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 5 September 2006 at 18:41, Luigi Ballabio wrote: | | On Sep 3, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | s/small/self-contained/ then. Do you have some example where the | > | linking process of some c++ files takes ages, without linking them | > | against some external library? That

Bug#348792: 64-bit unclean logic found in _Jv_ulp

2006-09-05 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
reassign 348792 libgcj7-0 tags 348792 + patch thanks In the light of your recent pull of classpath 0.92, I took another look at this bug. The bad news is that it's still present; the good news is that I've found a fix, per the below patch (without which the test for L < 0 always fails on 64-bit s

Bug#383251: g++-4.1: FTBFS for RQuantLib on i386/testing

2006-09-05 Thread Luigi Ballabio
On Sep 3, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | s/small/self-contained/ then. Do you have some example where the | linking process of some c++ files takes ages, without linking them | against some external library? That would make things much easier | imho. I agree. But as I am unsure

Bug#386121: libstdc++6: Incompatibility with older libgcc_s.so.1

2006-09-05 Thread Stefan Bellon
Package: libstdc++6 Version: 4.1.1-13 Severity: important I have problems with version 4.1.1ds1-13 of package libstdc++6 as this breaks some older applications. If you have the sources, you can recompile, if not ... what is the suggested solution? What happens is this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldd foo

Processing of gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.changes

2006-09-05 Thread Archive Administrator
gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb gij-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb libgcj7-0_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb libgcj7-awt_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb libgcj7

gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.changes ACCEPTED

2006-09-05 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gappletviewer-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1-base_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1_4.1.1-13_mipsel.deb gij-4.1_4.1.1-1

Re: kernel build dependency on gcc-4.0?

2006-09-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Will gcc-4.0 be dropped as a build dependency for etch, or be kept? The alpha maintainer said, gcc-4.1 is not capable to build the linux kernel, the same applies to m68k. Any other architecture can use it. hppa just did not switch o

Re: kernel build dependency on gcc-4.0?

2006-09-05 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hello, On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Will gcc-4.0 be dropped as a build dependency for etch, or be kept? It will be dropped. Currently, only hppa and alpha still build-depend on gcc-4.0. This will be changed with linux-2.6 2.6.18-1 (and maybe in 2.6.17 too, if

kernel build dependency on gcc-4.0?

2006-09-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Will gcc-4.0 be dropped as a build dependency for etch, or be kept? And on which architectures? Would you mind dropping gcc-4.0 from etch for some architectures? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]