[Bug target/26415] [4.2 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap error during stage2

2006-06-20 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #9 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:50 --- > But the bootstrap error is a different > problem, since a floating point branch does not have a 8 bit field. Please > move the test cases to a new bug, and instead attach a testcase for the > original problem. I don't see

[Bug target/26415] [4.2 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap error during stage2

2006-06-20 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #8 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-06-20 22:43 --- The problem with the attached testcases is that gcc is using fbCC instead of fjCC. The former set of insns is interpreted by GAS as fixed length branches with 16 bit offset, whereas the latter is handled as variable sized br

[Bug target/26415] [4.2 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap error during stage2

2006-06-20 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:19 --- Created an attachment (id=11715) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11715&action=view) test case from application synfig This test case is probably also interesting because it shows a slightly different erro

[Bug target/26415] [4.2 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap error during stage2

2006-06-20 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:08 --- I can provide more testcases on request but I think the general pattern is clear from these two: 23:00 < apinski> tbm: what is on the line which the assembler is complaining about 23:01 < tbm> fbnlt .L297 23:03 < apinski> th

[Bug target/26415] [4.2 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap error during stage2

2006-06-20 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:06 --- Created an attachment (id=11714) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11714&action=view) test case from application grace 577:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] /usr/local/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-gcc -c -O2 pars.c ... /tmp/ccai

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status rep

Processed: forwarded

2006-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 374410 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28102 Bug#374410: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS on hurd-i386: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28102. > tags 374410 + upstream Bug#374410: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS

Bug#359281: forwarded already

2006-06-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
forwarded 359281 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR26415 tags 359281 + upstream thanks It seems that doko has forwarded a "value out of range" error already, but without a testcase. I'll attach some testcases. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

[Bug target/26415] [4.2 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap error during stage2

2006-06-20 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 22:03 --- Created an attachment (id=11713) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11713&action=view) test case from application torcs 572:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] /usr/local/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-g++ -c -O2 track.cc ... /tmp/cc

[bts-link] source package gcc-snapshot

2006-06-20 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #361569 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27149 # * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED # * remote resolutio

[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0

2006-06-20 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #369817 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27861 # * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> NEW usertags 369817 - statu

[Bug target/26415] [4.2 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap error during stage2

2006-06-20 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-20 21:54 --- This is a very common error on m68k. We got another bug report, see http://bugs.debian.org/359281, which says: > torcs, grace, and rscheme all fail with variations on the theme of > track.s: Assembler messages: > track.s:10

[Bug target/26415] [4.2 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap error during stage2

2006-06-20 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schwab at suse dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26415

Bug#153472: Gvie it a try

2006-06-20 Thread Damien Nash
Those police officers are practicing driving between the two buildings.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] How are you? I need a degre_ee in: -Accounting -Business -Criminal- justice -Educ-ation -Health -Technology There are no requ-ired tests, classes, books, or interviews! Call- this number: 1-2-0-6-984-4

[Bug java/8923] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE when modifying a variable decleared "final static"

2006-06-20 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|28067 | nThis|| BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug java/2499] Class members should be inherited from implemented interfaces

2006-06-20 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|28067 | nThis|| BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug java/22507] GCJ segfaults building Apache Cocoon

2006-06-20 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|28067 | nThis|| BugsThisDependsOn|

Bug#186922: [Bug java/10581] ICE compiling freenet

2006-06-20 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|28067 | nThis|| BugsThisDependsOn|

Bug#374410: forwarded

2006-06-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
forwarded 374410 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR28102 tags 374410 + upstream thanks My patch didn't work so I've forwarded this now. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#374410: yeah

2006-06-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Yeah, this is due to: r111235 | jsm28 | 2006-02-18 12:12:51 +0100 (Sat, 18 Feb 2006) | 82 lines http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01493.html Some GNU file needs to be updated. I've a patch but it needs to be tested. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em