Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: minor
gcc-4.0 puts three dangling symlinks on my system - is that meant to be
the case?
/bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/64/libstdc++.so: No such file or
directory
/bin/ls: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/64/libgcc_s.so: No such file or
di
clone 365900 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 libgnatprj4.1 needs prio optional in the override file
severity 365900 important
thanks
Make libgnatvsn4.1 and libgnatprj4.1 priority optional, changed in
svn, needs changes in the override file.
Blars Blarson writes:
> Package: libgnatprj4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 365900 -1
Bug#365900: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1
Bug 365900 cloned as bug 366196.
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug#366196: priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1
Bug reassigned from pa
Please STOP resetting the forwarded address and revert the changes you
already did. We do loose information in the upstream BTS: it becomes
more tedious to track the reverse direction (upstream -> Debian),
unless you add information to the upstream bug report as well.
I.e. you have to search now _e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.0
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Fri May 5 17:57:22 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #85535
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR12086
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 85535 http://gcc.gnu.o
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.4
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #217360
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1027
# * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
# * remote resolution chan
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.3
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #169862
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1823
# * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
# * remote resolution chan
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.0
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #195344
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 195344 http://gcc.gnu.
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #140201
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21334
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
forwarded 140201 http://gcc.gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 28 16:10:47 UTC 2006 (revision 113350)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2317
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running tar
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 28 16:10:47 UTC 2006 (revision 113350)
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn1.c execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/closure_fn2.c ex
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.4
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-3.3
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 15:06 ---
Now we print something nicer:
opsy. gij t
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.VirtualMachineError: found class file for
class t, but no interpreter configured in this libgcj
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org chan
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 15:05 ---
Subject: Bug 27294
Author: tromey
Date: Fri May 5 15:05:20 2006
New Revision: 113554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113554
Log:
PR libgcj/27294:
* java/lang/natVMClassLoader.c
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-snapshot
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #361602
# * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR25776
# * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGNED
usertags 361602 - sta
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||27439
nThis||
http://gcc.g
21 matches
Mail list logo
