--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 05:50
---
Hmm, maybe really this is just the RA playing tricks in that it should be able
to move
(insn 22 16 48 3 (set (reg:V4SI 126)
(vec_duplicate:V4SI (const_int 1 [0x1]))) 755 {altivec_vspltisw} (nil)
(expr_l
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 05:45
---
The problem here is that we don't recongize the constant is resepentable with
vspltisw.
Hmm.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are o
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:53:03PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > Is this acutally decided? Is it likely to happen soon, or should I
> > build GMP with gcc 3.3 (which doesn't exhibit the problem) in the
> > short term?
> For now, I suggest that you remove gcc-4.1 from your build system.
> Th
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|mark at codesourcery dot com|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27094
--- You
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 23:29
---
Fixed in 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summa
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 23:25
---
Subject: Bug 27094
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Apr 30 23:25:44 2006
New Revision: 113400
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113400
Log:
PR c++/27094
* pt.c (tsubst_default_argume
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 23:21
---
Subject: Bug 27094
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Apr 30 23:21:38 2006
New Revision: 113399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113399
Log:
PR c++/27094
* pt.c (tsubst_default_argume
> Is this acutally decided? Is it likely to happen soon, or should I
> build GMP with gcc 3.3 (which doesn't exhibit the problem) in the
> short term?
For now, I suggest that you remove gcc-4.1 from your build system.
Then, GMP should build fine with 4.0. You might have to reinstall
4.0.
As far
OK: it sounds to me like the consensus is that HPPA should move to GCC
4.1 for C++, optionally leaving other languages at GCC 4.0.
Is this acutally decided? Is it likely to happen soon, or should I
build GMP with gcc 3.3 (which doesn't exhibit the problem) in the
short term?
Thanks,
-Steve
--
This is CVE-2006-1902. Please mention the id in the changelog.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #18 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 17:56
---
Andrew --
Thanks for investigating this, and for attempting to tolerate this bit of
weirdness from the front end.
-- Mark
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757
--- You are receiving this
Your message dated Sun, 30 Apr 2006 10:02:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365388: fixed in gcj-4.1 4.1.0-2j1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-2j1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-2j1_hppa.deb
gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-2j1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1-base_4.1.0-2j1_powerpc.deb
gcj-4.1_4.1.0-2j1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.1/gcj-4.1_4.1.0-2j1.diff.gz
gcj-4.1_4.1.0-2j1.dsc
to
gcj-4.1_4.1.0-2j1_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgcj7-dev_4.1.0-2j1_powerpc.deb
libgcj7-awt_4.1.0-2j1_hppa.deb
libgcj7_4.1.0-2j1_powerpc.deb
libgcj7-jar_4.1.0-2j1_all.deb
libgcj7-dev_4.1.0-2j1_hppa.deb
gij-4.1_4.1.0-2j1_powerpc.deb
libgcj-doc
16 matches
Mail list logo
