--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 01:56 ---
*** Bug 27275 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 01:56 ---
This is a dup of bug 24955 which was closed as will not fix.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24955 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 01:52 ---
I can no longer reproduce this. Does it reproduce for you still?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27088
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 01:50 ---
The ICE is due to looking at the type of a freed SSA_NAME during IV-OPTs.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
This is now C++ core DR 577:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#577
--
Ben Hutchings
Every program is either trivial or else contains at least one bug
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[This relates to gcc PR c++/7302 and Debian bug 356316.]
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please could you send this patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED], together
> with a ChangeLog entry?
I was holding off on this until I had time to deal with documentation
and test cases as well. Now that I've done tha
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:22:20AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
...
> I recognized that this was going to cause pain, and brought the matter
> up for discussion on the parisc-linux list a few months ago. There
> wasn't much in the way of comments for or against. In the end, I
> decided it was
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 18:14
---
The correct fix for this issue is for the C++ front-end to save and restore
information about a declaration as scopes are entered and exited.
For example, given:
extern void f(int);
void g() {
extern voi
The removal of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set.
Date of this removal: Sun Apr 23 11:15:10 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
--
Accepted:
gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-2_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.0/gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-2_hppa.deb
gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.0/gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-2_i386.deb
gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcj-4.0/gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-2_powerpc.deb
gcj-4.0_4.0.3-2.diff.gz
t
gcj-4.0_4.0.3-2_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgcj6-src_4.0.3-2_all.deb
gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-2_i386.deb
libgcj6_4.0.3-2_i386.deb
libgcj6-dev_4.0.3-2_i386.deb
libgcj6_4.0.3-2_powerpc.deb
gij-4.0_4.0.3-2_powerpc.deb
gcj-4.0-base_4.0.3-2_powerpc.d
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 16:18
---
A better testcase comes from PR 27268 which seg faults at all optimizations
level currently (though this case can also be optimized out to be an infinite
loop really):
public class test
{
public test()
{
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 16:16
---
*** Bug 27268 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 16:16 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1373 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
The subscription of the email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To the mailing list:
Al-Manahel Newsletter List
is all set. Thanks for subscribing!
Date of this subscription: Sun Apr 23 09:01:06 2006
Please save this email message for future reference.
-
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:24:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
> > I have no idea how to give a more useful bug report.
>
> compile the source files in more than one pass and identify the
> problematic file(s)?
The last file it opened was
classpath/java/lang/DoubleToString.
On some platforms, upstream provides a dummy (no-op) version of
convert_addresses in adaint.c, which collides with the good version
provided by ada-symbolic-tracebacks.dpatch in convert_addresses.c.
Remove the dummy version.
Apply this patch on top of patch #2; it does not collide with any of
my l
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> I have no idea how to give a more useful bug report.
compile the source files in more than one pass and identify the
problematic file(s)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patch #9 is missing the file debian/gnatprj.gpr. Here is that file
attached as plain text.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
-- Project file for use with GNAT 3.15p
-- Copyright (c) 2005 Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
-- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
-- it und
forwarded 340651 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27268
tags 340651 + upstream
retitle 340651 [PR java/27268] Dies with sigseg
thanks
hint: the blackdown runtime is more verbose:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.StackOverflowError
at test.(test.java)
at test.(test.java:5)
at test.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 327411 350772
Bug#327411: libgcj6-dev: execution of java program compiled with --static fails
in gnu.regexp init
Bug#350772: libgcj6-dev: test program for regex bug
Merged 327411 350772.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 340651 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27268
Bug#340651: gij-4.0: Dies with sigseg
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27268.
> tags 340651 + upstream
Bug#340651: gij-4.0: Dies with sigseg
There were no tags set.
Tag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 335650 + fixed-upstream
Bug#335650: gij-4.0: assertion failure with rhdb-explain
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> tags 335650 + upstream
Bug#335650: gij-4.0: assertion failure with rhdb-explain
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 351512 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR8923
Bug#351512: gcj-4.0: internal compiler error when trying to compile bogus source
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR8923.
> tags 351512 + upstream
Bug#351512: gcj-4.0: int
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 348792 - patch
Bug#348792: libgcj6: string-to-double conversion can throw NullPointerException
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: important
I am feeling exactly the same problems as the ones reported in the gcc
bugzilla bug report 21280. That is using #pragma interface and
templates gives "inline function used but never defined"
warnings and failure with missing symbols at link
26 matches
Mail list logo
