[Bug target/26562] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn with huge symbol offset with -fPIC

2006-04-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.4/4.0 Regression]|[4.0 Regression] |unrecognizable insn with|unre

[Bug c++/26558] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] segfault on syntax error

2006-04-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] |segfault on syntax error

[Bug tree-optimization/16876] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE on testcase with -O3 in gen_lowpart and fold-const

2006-04-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE |ICE on testcase with

Bug#361024: 361024: and lack of feedback

2006-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 07:21:49PM -0700, Gordon Haverland wrote: > Is the only option to upgrade to a 2.6 kernel? If you want a quick fix, your options are to upgrade to a 2.6 kernel, or to install the old version of libstdc++6 from gcc 4.0 and put it on hold until this bug is fixed in the archiv

Bug#361024: 361024: and lack of feedback

2006-04-11 Thread Gordon Haverland
Occasionally I get an email from someone who is reporting back to many people, but in general I have gotten NO FEEDBACK on this bug report! It apparently wasn't reproducible to the person fielding the bug report, but it is reproducible here. I asked, what can I do to send you info to fix this

Re: Bug#361883: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: tpow test fails

2006-04-11 Thread Laurent Fousse
* Martin Michlmayr [Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:44:00AM +0200]: > * Laurent Fousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-11 09:27]: > > Thanks for your report. I've forwarded it upstream, and I'm currently > > trying to reproduce it to see if it's package-specific. I assume you > > are using the gcc-snapshot pa

[Bug tree-optimization/27087] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in merge_alias_info

2006-04-11 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com 2006-04-11 05:56 --- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in merge_alias_info On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 23:16 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-08 23:16 > ---

[Bug tree-optimization/27087] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in merge_alias_info

2006-04-11 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from law at redhat dot com 2006-04-11 05:41 --- The problem is that may_propagate_copy and merge_alias_info are inconsistent. ie, DOM properly calls may_propagate_copy to determine if a particular copy propagation is valid. may_propagate_copy returns true indicating the

Bug#361942: gij-4.1: bogus java.home property

2006-04-11 Thread jim
Package: gij-4.1 Version: 4.1.0-1 Severity: important [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ javac GetJVMInfo.java [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ java GetJVMInfo java.version= 1.4.2 java.vendor= Free Software Foundation, Inc. java.home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/jre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -la /usr/lib/jv

Processed: Re: Bug#361904: Failed to load application: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data

2006-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 361904 libstdc++6 Bug#361904: Failed to load application: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle TLS data Bug reassigned from package `apt-proxy' to `libstdc++6'. > severity 361904 critical Bug#361904: Failed to load application: libstdc++.so.6: cannot

Processed: mark as forwarded

2006-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 361883 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27116 Bug#361883: wrong code compilation in conditional Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR27116. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Processed: Re: Bug#361883: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: tpow test fails

2006-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 361883 gcc-snapshot Bug#361883: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: tpow test fails Bug reassigned from package `mpfr' to `gcc-snapshot'. > retitle 361883 wrong code compilation in conditional Bug#361883: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: tpow test fails Changed Bug title.

Bug#361445: Log for failed build of kino_0.80-2

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr
more PIC problems: > Automatic build of kino_0.80-2 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > g++ -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/../lib64/crti.o > /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.0/crtbeginS.o > .libs/entry_points.o .libs/blur.o .libs/color_hold.o .libs/image_luma.o > .libs/soft_focu

Bug#361445: Log for failed build of regina-normal_4.3-1

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr
here: > Automatic build of regina-normal_4.3-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor > -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align > -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -W

Bug#361602: Log for failed build of apt-watch_0.3.2-5

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr
and here: > Automatic build of apt-watch_0.3.2-5 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. "-I../common"-g -O2 > -Wall -Werror -c apt-watch-slave.cc > cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors > apt-watch-slave.cc: In function 'void do_su(int, int)

Bug#361445: Log for failed build of openvrml_0.15.10-5

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr
PIC: > Automatic build of openvrml_0.15.10-5 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > g++ -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/../lib64/crti.o > /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.2.0/crtbeginS.o > openvrml/.libs/basetypes.o openvrml/.libs/img.o openvrml/.libs/system.o > openvrml/.libs/field_v

Bug#361591: Log for failed build of xscreensaver_4.24-1

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr
one more: > Automatic build of xscreensaver_4.24-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 1.112 ... > x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pedantic -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs > -std=c89 -U__STRICT_ANSI__ -c -I. -I. -I./../utils -I.. -DXTHREADS > -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/inclu

Bug#359699: gcc-4.0: Can't compile 32-bit on amd64

2006-04-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:38:15AM +0200, Anders Bostr??m wrote: > gcc -m32 works if I create the this link: > /usr/lib32 -> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib > > What package should create that link? > A recent glibc provides the link, so I think you will have to upgrade. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno

Bug#359699: gcc-4.0: Can't compile 32-bit on amd64

2006-04-11 Thread Anders Boström
gcc -m32 works if I create the this link: /usr/lib32 -> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib What package should create that link? / Anders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]