--- Comment #93 from geoffk at geoffk dot org 2006-04-04 00:23 ---
Subject: Re: libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around
the declarations
On 03/04/2006, at 4:57 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #92 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #92 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-03 23:57
---
Both PR 27000 and bug 26984 are reasons why push/pop will fail currently.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||27000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664
--- You
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_1_0_release revision 111560
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2316
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
--- Comment #10 from rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2006-04-03 17:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] wrong final value of induction variable
calculated
> > (In reply to comment #6)
> > > I believe c-common.c:pointer_int_sum is wrong in relying on pointer
> > >
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2006-04-03 16:59 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] wrong final value
of induction variable calculated
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > I believe c-common.c:pointer_int_sum is wrong in
--- Comment #8 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-03 16:52 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I believe c-common.c:pointer_int_sum is wrong in relying on pointer overflow
> during conversion of the integer offset to an unsigned pointer. I'm sending
> a patch that fixes this for com
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-03 16:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR26763
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00082.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
8 matches
Mail list logo
