Howdy,
I incorporated Lennert's suggestion and created a patch that fixes the
problem on at least i386.
--
Matt
diff -ru gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules2
gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules2
--- gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules2 2005-10-13 06:58:48.0
-0700
+++ gcc-2.95-2.
Sandor Bodo-Merle writes:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Unfortunately i can confirm that this bug is still present in Breezy Badger
> to.
> See http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
did I say something else?
> Only libgcj6-awt exhibit this problem. Kaffe and jamvm with latest
> classpath runs t
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-08-18 21:15:51 |2005-10-13 20:55:16
date||
Hi Matthias,
Unfortunately i can confirm that this bug is still present in Breezy Badger to.
See http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13942
Only libgcj6-awt exhibit this problem. Kaffe and jamvm with latest
classpath runs the programs normally.
I think this can be a showstopper for a lot of
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0/4.1 Regression]|[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression]
|Segfault with #pragma onc
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:45:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329820: Acknowledgement (gcc-3.4: DEB_VERSION when
binary-only NMU)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 333733 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23503
Bug#333733: libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error while painting JFrame
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23503.
> tags 333733 + upstream
Bug#333733: libgcj6-aw
forwarded 333733 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23503
tags 333733 + upstream
tags 333733 + fixed-upstream
severity 333733 normal
retitle 333733 [fixed in 4.1] libgcj6-awt: gcj-4.0 / libgcj: Assertion error
thanks
Hannes Diethelm writes:
> What is the upstream PR?
> Here are the links to smillar Bugs:
> http
What is the upstream PR?
Here are the links to smillar Bugs:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=324502
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-classpath/2005-08/msg00128.html
With gcj-3.4, the programm shows a small Window and there is no
exception.
Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 15:5
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24348
--- You
Hannes Diethelm writes:
> Package: libgcj6-awt
> Version: 4.0.2-2
> Severity: important
>
>
> I've found this bug at gnu's bugzilla, it is marked as fixed, but it
> isn't in fact.
interesting, for 4.0.2? Please tell us the upstream PR.
thanks, Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Greetings!
My apologies, but time is quite tight. I barely found the time to
file the original bug. The overhead to the bug submitter implied by:
Camm, thanks for the increasing number of bug reports ;-)
- please make sure to test with recent compiler versions (currently
4.0.1-9).
- please c
Greetings and thanks! I've put this in to gcl 2.6.7-10 -- we'll see
...
Take care,
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> severity 327849 important
> thanks
>
> -fdollars-in-identifiers work can be used as a workaround. see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111 for the upstream report.
>
>
>
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24348
--- You
merge 333100 323686
thanks
Michael Meskes writes:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:43:56PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > > dcopinterface_skel.cpp:51: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at
> > > cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
> > > Please submit a full bug report,
> >
> > Please send the preproces
--- Comment #12 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:14 ---
probably should be backported to 3.4
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Package: libgcj6-awt
Version: 4.0.2-2
Severity: important
I've found this bug at gnu's bugzilla, it is marked as fixed, but it
isn't in fact.
If you compile this code:
class test{
public static void main(String[] args){
javax.swing.JFrame gg = new javax.swing.JFrame();
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
18 matches
Mail list logo