Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-7
Followup-For: Bug #328939
This bug can reproduce under gcc-snapshot. should I clone it to
gcc-snapshot?
gcc-snapshot is somehow better, it remove the unused symbol.
$ cat const.cpp
//const.cpp
extern const double minute;
const double second = 1.0;
const double
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:25:37 +1200
Source: gcc-3.3
Binary: gcc-3.3-nof gcc-3.3 libobjc1 libgcc1 lib64g2c0 libstdc++5-3.3-doc
libgcj4 gpc-2.1-3.3-doc libstdc++5 cpp-3.3-doc protoize gcc-3.3-hppa64 cpp-3.3
libgcj4-awt libstdc++5-3.3-dbg g77-3.3-doc gpc-2.1-3.3 g77-3.3 libgcj4-dev
gc
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:09:51 +1200
Source: python-iwtools
Binary: python-iwtools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-2
Distribution: crcnet-bpc
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Scott Raynel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Scott Raynel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
python-iwtools - Mo
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-19
21:04 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> A regression hunt on i686-linux showed the failure starting with this patch
> from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00640.html
If the lreg dump i
I am seeing this bug as well.
$ CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/FreeGuide.jar gij freeguide.FreeGuide
** ERROR **: file
../../../src/libjava/jni/gtk-peer/gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_GtkImage.c:
line 572 (createRawData): assertion failed: (data_fid != 0)
aborting...
Aborted
freeguide is in Debian contrib, so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 329135 http://gcc.gnu.org/23602
Bug#329135: [i386] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when
configured for i486-linux
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/23602.
> tags 329135 + upstream
Bug#3291
Package: gcc
Version: 4.1
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental, help
configuring HEAD for i486-linux (instead of the default i686-linux),
libjava fails with 1081 test failures (instead of two with
i686-linux). apparently all the execution tests fail. Compiling the
testcase by hand, and running it,
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-09-19
19:42 ---
A regression hunt on i686-linux showed the failure starting with this patch
from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00640.html
--
What|Removed
> On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine,
> and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get:
this is known, we're waiting on proper 64bit support from glibc. I'd
like to downgrade this one until we have the support.
Goto, you did say, you wanted address t
Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The patch below fixes this problem, it's only workaround to keep combine
> from generating this subreg. For 4.1 this should be fixed properly.
> Andreas, any better ideas, objections?
I don't know, but that looks surely the wrong way to go.
Andreas.
-
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-8
Severity: serious
Hello,
On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine,
and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get:
Will not build the Pascal compiler: disabled for 4.0
Will build the Ada compiler.
Will build the shared A
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||caolanm at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22132
--- You are receiving this ma
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-8
Severity: important
With 4.0.1-6 all is fine, but 4.0.1-6/7 trigger that error when
compiling debian's linux-source-2.6.12:
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/
13 matches
Mail list logo
