Bug#323313: marked as done (ICE compiling gnubik on i386 in size_binop)

Your message dated Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:45:50 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Unreproducible has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#321415: Bug#320038: gcc-4.0: ICE when building faust

On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 11:45:03PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > tags 320038 + moreinfo > thanks > > Hi, > > the gcc PR 23078 has been closed. Can you confirm the problem is gone > with a newer gcc snapshot? Both bugs talk about GCC 4.0.2. The Debian package is still 4.0.1 However, with gcc-sna

Processed: gcc stuff

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 284777 [fixed in 4.0.2] ICE in uses_template_parms at cp/pt.c:4860 Bug#284777: [PR 19004] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE in uses_template_parms at cp/pt.c:4860 Changed Bug title. > tags 284777 + fixed-upstream Bug#284777: [fixed in 4.0.2] ICE in use

Bug#320947: marked as done ([PR 20624] invalid 'control reaches end of non-void function')

Your message dated Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:49:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320947: invalid 'control reaches end of non-void function' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: Bug#320038: gcc-4.0: ICE when building faust

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 321415 + moreinfo Bug#321415: [PR 23080][m68k] ICE on building blacs-mpi Tags were: upstream Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#321415: Bug#320038: gcc-4.0: ICE when building faust

tags 321415 + moreinfo thanks Hi, the gcc PR 23080 has been closed. Can you confirm the problem is gone with a newer gcc snapshot? -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0

On Wednesday 07 September 2005 23:21, you wrote: > It would be extremely helpful if you could find a way to reproduce > this that does not require root... any ideas? Well, I think the problem can also be reproduced outside a debian-installer environment (getting linux-image-2.6.12-1-386 (2.6.12-2

Bug#320038: gcc-4.0: ICE when building faust

tags 320038 + moreinfo thanks Hi, the gcc PR 23078 has been closed. Can you confirm the problem is gone with a newer gcc snapshot? -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Bug#320038: gcc-4.0: ICE when building faust

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 320038 + moreinfo Bug#320038: [PR 23078] [PR23078][m68k] gcc-4.0: ICE when building faust Tags were: upstream Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#315021: marked as done (gcc-3.3: ICE compiling Linux 2.6.12 x86 using kernel-package)

Your message dated Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:25:52 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315021: gcc-3.3: ICE compiling Linux 2.6.12 x86 using kernel-package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#283042: marked as done (smilutils_0.3.0-5(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: bad hppa assembly)

Your message dated Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:19:01 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283042: smilutils_0.3.0-5(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: bad hppa assembly has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#180486: marked as done (gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher)

Your message dated Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:23:36 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#180486: gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0

Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've reassigned this bug from the kernel to gcc-4.0 as we feel that the > solution chosen in the kernel packaging is not really a fix, but a > workaround. > As tests have shown that the problem does not exist when the same kernel > is compiled with gcc-3.

Bug#315667: marked as done (stack smash gcc)

Your message dated Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:15:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315667: stack smash gcc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0

I've reassigned this bug from the kernel to gcc-4.0 as we feel that the solution chosen in the kernel packaging is not really a fix, but a workaround. As tests have shown that the problem does not exist when the same kernel is compiled with gcc-3.3, the real bug is likely in gcc-4.0. I've "foun

Bug#318865: odbc-postgresql: Segfault when running ODBC describe, amd64 client

tags 318865 + moreinfo thanks Hi, can this problem be still reproduced with a newer gcc version such as 4.0? Is it possible to make a standalone test case? -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Bug#318865: odbc-postgresql: Segfault when running ODBC describe, amd64 client

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 318865 + moreinfo Bug#318865: odbc-postgresql: Segfault when running ODBC describe, amd64 client There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Reopen/reassign #322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 322723 Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0 Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Processed: Reopen/reassign #322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 322723 gcc-4.0 Bug#322723: D-I: 'ip route add' fails w/ "Network is unreachable" Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `gcc-4.0'. > found 322723 4.0.1-3 Bug#322723: D-I: 'ip route add' fails w/ "Network is unreachable" Bug marked as found

[Bug middle-end/23711] [4.1 regression] [s390] bootstrap error in libjava (ICE in fixup_eh_region_note)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-07 14:03 --- Fixed by: 2005-09-07 Andreas Krebbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * reload1.c (fixup_eh_region_note): Remove assertion. (fixup_abnormal_edges): Reverted removal of call to find_many_sub_bas

[Bug libstdc++/13943] call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-07 10:55 --- Fixed for 4.1.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/23453] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of PARI/GP on x86 with gcse after reload

-- What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug ada/23732] [ada] Library_Version still at 4.0 ?

--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-07 09:00 --- I'll take care of it. Arno -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot