Bug#128993: Talk to you again soon.

What up.its me Sara Girl. Just see whats new? I hope we can talk some more later or something. Hey i got some new pictures taken that Id like you to see. See ya later. http://ecbtq.supersocketcoat.com/sa16/ Elena creating. nope-supersocketcoat.com/1m/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

[Bug libmudflap/23170] [4.0 only] libmudflap should not use functions marked obsolescent by POSIX/SUS

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01 12:15 --- These usage have been removed from the mainline. Confirmed. Fixed on the mainline by: 2005-07-16 Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * acinclude.m4: New file. * configure.ac: Invoke LI

java-gcj-compat_1.0.30-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.30-3_i386.deb to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.30-3_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.30-3.diff.gz to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.0.30-3.diff.gz java-gcj-compat_1.0.30-3.dsc to pool/main/j/java-gcj-compat/java-gcj-compat_1.

Bug#317821: marked as done (java-gcj-compat-dev: javadoc needs wrapper script to use gij vm to execute)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 05:02:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317821: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.30-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processing of java-gcj-compat_1.0.30-3_i386.changes

java-gcj-compat_1.0.30-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-gcj-compat_1.0.30-3.dsc java-gcj-compat_1.0.30-3.diff.gz java-gcj-compat-dev_1.0.30-3_i386.deb java-gcj-compat_1.0.30-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSC