On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:44:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> dh_shlibdeps doesn't work for 64bit packages, so you have to hand-code
> all the dependencies ...
It does if running on a kernel which is able to execute the binaries.
> maybe dpkg-shlibdeps could use objdump -x instead of ldd to d
Are sales slow right now? Fix it:
http://www.wwwgethits.com
no more
http://www.enhancemetoday.com/rlink/
j RND_DIGIT[1-3] EHW
aren't barr bride rudy croak downside clapeyron thin strangulate rockaway
exacerbate impracticable colonel clo
glowing
First we would like to say Thank You to al| of our avid
readers! We have had great success over the last few
months and have become one of the most wide|y read
investment newsletters in the wor|d. We have accomplished
this by providing timely, accurate financial information with
proven res
Hows it been going?
Finally you can get PPV Sports, Movies, Adult Channels,
OnDemand, ect. Best of all, without paying extra for it!
We are offering you these Digital Cable - 54 mhz High
Pass Filters. Check out our website on how well they work!
Our Website : onceaweek.info
This is a true univ
Good day to you sir,
Finally you can get PPV Sports, Movies, Adult Channels,
OnDemand, ect. Best of all, without paying extra for it!
We are offering you these Digital Cable - 54 mhz High
Pass Filters. Check out our website on how well they work!
Our Website : onceaweek.info
This is a true uni
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from CVS: -rgcc_4_0_1_release
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c954025
FAIL: c99004a
FAIL: ce2103d
FAIL: cxf3a01
FAIL: cxf3a02
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2315
# of unexpected failures5
Native configurati
The men is rich when he is healthy!
http://njmr.wtz7ifwpboem0fe.uparmlgblh.info
A little bad taste is like a nice dash of paprika.
I told you I was sick.
The visionary lies to himself, the liar only to others.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:05:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ant/gij crash unreproducible/fixed in gij-4.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:17:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-3.4 doesn't build on sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:11:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line not a bug report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:39:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317268: g++-4.0: Assembler problem with g++-3.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
fixed with binutils-2.16.1
Yannick Beynet writes:
> Package: g++-4.0
> Version: 4.0.0-12
> Severity: important
>
> When I Try to compile with g++-4.0 I have some assembler messages like
> this :
> tmp/cceXLCbg.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/cceXLCbg.s:615: Warning: ignoring changed section attribu
Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0
> Version: 4.0.0-12
> Severity: normal
>
> about anything i try to compile fails at link time with a message like
> this one if the objects are compiled with -march=pentium4:
>
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.a(Xinerama.o)(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_t
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:44:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317051: libgcj6: i386 package pulls lib64gcc1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:26:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317367: incorrect classpath & java.lang.Object cannot be
resolved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
GOTO Masanori writes:
> At Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:09:59 -0700,
> Ryan Murray wrote:
> > libc6-s390x is missing a depends on lib64gcc1 that causes gcc to fail to
> > link
> > when -m64 is used on an s390 system.
> >
> > I'm filling the bug here rather than on the gcc-VERSION packages because the
> > s
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:05:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317473: zlib_1:2.2.2-7 (sparc/unstable): FTBFS: cannot
find -lgcc_s for 64-bit build
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.4-5
Followup-For: Bug #317965
Sorry, I have forgot the patch. Here it is.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i586)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-16
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.4-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
The current version of gcc-3.4 in unstable fails to build from source on
GNU/kFreeBSD. Please find attached a patch to support this architecture.
Would it be possible to include it in the next upload?
Thanks in advance,
Aureli
Accepted:
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.1-2_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.1-2_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.1-2_i386.deb
fastjar_4.0.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.1-2_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.0.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fix
gcc-4.0_4.0.1-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.0_4.0.1-2.dsc
gcc-4.0_4.0.1-2.diff.gz
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.1-2_all.deb
libgcj6-common_4.0.1-2_all.deb
libgcj-common_4.0.1-2_all.deb
libgcj6-src_4.0.1-2_all.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0.1-2_all.deb
g
At Tue, 05 Jul 2005 20:09:59 -0700,
Ryan Murray wrote:
> libc6-s390x is missing a depends on lib64gcc1 that causes gcc to fail to link
> when -m64 is used on an s390 system.
>
> I'm filling the bug here rather than on the gcc-VERSION packages because the
> sparc64 packages have the dependency in li
Feel insecure about your penis size?
http://www.felmuh.com/ss/
Underpromise; overdeliver.
A great many open minds should be closed for repairs.
It requires more courage to suffer than to die.
The ultimate test of a relationship is to disagree but hold hands.
He who comes fi
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-12
05:56 ---
*** Bug 22428 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
24 matches
Mail list logo
