Bug#312741: libgcj6: misplaced conflicts on libgcj[45]-dev

Package: libgcj6 Severity: normal For some reason, it is libgcj6 rather than libgcj6-dev that conflicts with libgcj4-dev and libgcj5-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.9 Locale: LANG=en

Results for 4.1.0 20050607 (experimental) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 7 23:46:45 UTC 2005 Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.C scan-tree-dump-times &this 0 XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test === g++ Summary === # o

Results for 3.4.5 20050605 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.4-0) testsuite on mips-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 5 11:57:12 UTC 2005 Native configuration is mips-linux (resume.rfc822.org) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: bo4-19.pas FAIL: chief56.pas FAIL: emptyrec.pas FAIL: fjf1021d.pas FAIL: fjf1021h.pas FAIL: fjf1021i.pas FAIL: fjf1021j.pas FAIL: fjf1021k

Results for 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-6) testsuite on sparc-linux

LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is sparc-linux (vore) === gpc tests === Running target any FAIL: chief56.pas FAIL: fjf1021d.pas FAIL: fjf1021h.pas FAIL: fjf1021i.pas FAIL: fjf1021j.pas FAIL: fjf1021k.pas FAIL: fjf980a.pas FAIL: fjf980b.pas FAIL: fjf998r.pas FAIL: mir047h.pas

Re: linking error of basic_string

* Victor Hsieh: > std::basic_string ustr; You have to provide an explicit specialization of std::char_traits before you can use std::basic_string like that. This means that your program is invalid. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Bug#310624: marked as done (gcc-3.3: Old code is not compiled with gcc > 2.95 (with error: initializer element is not constant))

Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:08:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310624: gcc-3.3: Old code is not compiled with gcc > 2.95 (with error: initializer element is not constant) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#251149: marked as done (gcc wrapper for sparc is chronically broken)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:44:18 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#251149: gcc wrapper for sparc is chronically broken has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#312649: gcc-3.4 doesn't build on sarge

Package: gcc-3.4 Version: 3.4.3 Severity: normal gcc-3.4, respectively libstdc++6-0, doesn't build, it fails in stage2. This is what I do: sh-2.05b$ apt-get source libstdc++6-0 sh-2.05b$ cd gcc-3.4-3.4.3 sh-2.05b$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us [build begins] ... make[5]: Entering direct

Bug#312634: gcc-3.3: gcc in not managed with update-alternatives

Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.5-12 Severity: normal Why gcc in not under /etc/alternatives? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KO

Bug#277845: This seems to be fixed upstream...

Looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/PR18591 it seems that "upstream" have fixed the issue (arround 2005-06-05) Alex Owen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

linking error of basic_string

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Victor Hsieh >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: linking error of basic_string >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Category: c++ >Class: rejects-legal >Release: 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-6) (Debian testing/unstable) >En