Need software? Click here.
http://ystf.3apiok3wivlaiml.fgbasvbk.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Make the login environment be sparc32 by default. Doesn't that
> > solve the problem? And for die-hard 64-bit people like me they
> > can undo this via some configuration mechanism.
> >
> > It is one option.
>
> That's probably too ugly for some ppl. Then we'll have to answer the
> que
package: gcc-3.4
New upstream version 3.4.4 fixes 163 bugs. List of problems fixed in
3.4.4 are at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=3.4.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:27:22PM -0700, David S.Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 20:21:57 -0400
>
> > But (and this but is for David), that means users can't simply do
> > "apt-get source foo; cd foo-1.1; dpkg-buildpackage" and get the same build
> >
From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 20:21:57 -0400
> But (and this but is for David), that means users can't simply do
> "apt-get source foo; cd foo-1.1; dpkg-buildpackage" and get the same build
> they got from us, which is a consistency Debian needs. Maintainers trying
>
You're right. Didn't get down that far. As far as I'm concerned, the
default 64-bit is the right thing. But it's hard to convince long time
users that a machine that is 99% 32-bit userspace, should compile 64-bit
binaries by default, when 99% of the time, those same people are going to
want 32-bit.
The other alternative is to "touch /etc/disable_64_gcc
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 04:05:21PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:06:52 +0200
> Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > this bug has been open for quite some time as "important". Can some
> > sparc people please
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:24:18 -0700
> The other alternative is to "touch /etc/disable_64_gcc
Sure, but in the mail you are specifically replying to I stated:
> > Also, /etc/disable_64_gcc is a workaround and should not be there
> > by default as it is now, especially on
Accepted:
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
fastjar_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fix
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 305690 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#305690: gcc-4.0: Please change the Build-Depends
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental patch
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 308948 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#308948: gcc-4.0: Please add Ada support for the pp
tag 305690 + fixed-in-experimental
tag 308948 + fixed-in-experimental
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to an
upload to the experimental distribution. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 01:56:28 +0
Superb Quality Rolex.
The high! profile jewelry you're looking for at the lowest prices in the
nation!!..
http://www.ultimatetimepiece4u.net/
Choose from our collection of Rolex watches!
you airmail me panoply me you assyriology me tree me
you caucus me brigham me [2-5
--
To UNS
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
cpp-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/cpp-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
fastjar_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fastjar_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
fixincludes_4.0.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.0/fixincludes_4.
gcc-4.0_4.0.0-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.0_4.0.0-8.dsc
gcc-4.0_4.0.0-8.diff.gz
cpp-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
libgcj6-common_4.0.0-8_all.deb
libgcj-common_4.0.0-8_all.deb
libgcj6-src_4.0.0-8_all.deb
libstdc++6-4.0-doc_4.0.0-8_all.deb
g
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-05-23 17:21 ---
Seems to be fixed in 4.1.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|3.3.6 3.4.4 |3.3.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||schwab at suse dot de
Known to fail|3.3.6 3.4.4 |4.0.1
Known to work|4.0.1
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||3.3.6 3.4.4
Known to work||4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2005-05-23 16:49
---
Created an attachment (id=8952)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8952&action=view)
assembler file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21721
--- You are receiving this mail bec
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2005-05-23 16:48
---
Created an attachment (id=8951)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8951&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21721
--- You are receiving this mai
4.0 CVS 20050522 on ia64-linux, binutils-2.15, glibc-2.3.5,
works with 3.3.6 and 3.4.4 releases
$ gcc -O2 -g -c writet1.i
writet1.c: In function 'load_enc':
writet1.c:348: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
writet1.c: In function 't1_open_fontfile':
writet1.c:1000: warning
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Falk Hueffner wrote:
>> this seems to be the well-known exces precision problem of the
>> i386, so closing.
>
> I (mildly) protest the closing of this bug. The bug is not in fact
> "fixed" -- just "well-known". Even though it is due to a CPU issu
tags 309210 - moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> tags 309210 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> how can this problem be reproduced?
Easily:
1) download the tarball mentionned in the bug report and untar it
2) do
CC=gcc-4.0 ./Configure
3) do
make benc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 309210 - moreinfo
Bug#309210: gcc-4.0 miscompile PARI/GP on x86
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
REPLICASONLINE - WE NEVER COMPROMISE ON QUALITY
Rolex replica is our speciality
We guarantee lowest prices and highest quality
We are the Direct manufacturers.
For top quality rolex watchs pleas visit:
http://www.ultimatetimepiece4u.net
eave mwk mailmen il [2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this seems to be the well-known exces precision problem of the i386,
> so closing.
Hello,
I (mildly) protest the closing of this bug. The bug is not in fact
"fixed" -- just "well-known". Even though it is due to a CPU issue
rather than a compiler problem, unopti
Wish you could be better?
http://www.terima.net/ss/
Penis Growth Patches are here!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:19:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Content-Description: message body text
> > > I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for testing:
> > > gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5-13) testing-proposed-updates; urg
Get the Finest Rolex Watch Replica !
We only sell premium watches. There's no battery in these replicas
just like the real ones since they charge themselves as you move.
The second hand moves JUST like the real ones, too.
These original watches sell in stores for thousands of dollars.
We sell
My name is Julie :)
Most of the time I like to do something I've never done before.. so I decided
to have my first website featuring me (pics and videos). My girlfriends want
to join me to on my website. -) Verify your age and connect to my webcam today
-)
Come I want to share my life experi
29 matches
Mail list logo
