alice

All the meds you need: http://www.salver.info/?Gtkada Lana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ashmolean

All the meds you need: http://www.salver.info/?Cvsbook Bennett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb cpp-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb fastjar_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/fastjar_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb g++-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb to pool/m

gcc-3.4 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): fastjar_3.4.3-12.1_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the pa

Processed: Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/16052] strength reduction produces wrong code

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 254659 [fixed in 4.0] [PR 16066] i386 loop strength reduction bug Bug#254659: [PR 16066] i386 loop strength reduction bug Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Processed: Re: [Bug c/11459] -ansi -std=c99 -pedantic warns about C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 200392 [fixed in 3.4/4.0] [PR 11459] -stdc=c90 -pedantic warns about > C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode Bug#200392: [fixed in 4.0] [PR 11459] -stdc=c90 -pedantic warns about C90's non long-long support when in C99 mode Changed Bug

Bug#301064: gcc-3.4 build failure on hurd-i386

- which is the last version that built on hurd-i386? - does gcc-4.0 (experimental) build? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [Bug c++/18384] [3.3 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty initializer...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 285692 + fixed-upstream Bug#285692: [PR 19006] [3.3 / 3.4 / 4.0 regression] ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3255 Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > tags 285692 + wontfix Bug#285692: [PR 19006] [3.3 / 3.4 / 4.0 regression] ICE in tree

Processed: Re: [Bug target/20046] [3.3 regression] [powerpc-linux] 3.3 CVS miscompiles bind 9.3.0

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 292958 + fixed-upstream Bug#292958: [PR 20046] [3.3 regression] [powerpc-linux] 3.3 CVS miscompiles bind 9.3.0 Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > tags 292958 + wontfix Bug#292958: [PR 20046] [3.3 regression] [powerpc-linux] 3.3 CVS

Processed: Re: Bug#165635: [Bug java/8608] segmentation fault on compiling bad program

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 165635 + fixed-upstream Bug#165635: [fixed in 4.1] [PR java/8608] segmentation fault on compiling bad program Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > retitle 165635 [fixed in 4.1] segmentation fault on compiling bad progra

Bug#304606: marked as done (make gcc-3.4 SID default compiler)

Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2005 18:46:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line GCC default version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Processed: Re: Bug#306280: FTBFS: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 306280 + unreproducible Bug#306280: FTBFS: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `' Tags were: experimental Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#306280: FTBFS: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `'

tags 306280 + unreproducible thanks the package was uploaded for powerpc in experimental. I am unable to reproduce this error as well. Rene Engelhard writes: > Package: gcc-4.0 > Severity: serious > Tags: experimental > > [...] > /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build/g

Bug#307111: marked as done (gcc-4.0: Missing lsb-release build dependency)

Your message dated Mon, 2 May 2005 19:46:13 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307111: gcc-4.0: Missing lsb-release build dependency has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gcc-3.4 3.4.3-12.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 302995 + fixed Bug#302995: fastjar: postinst does not check for errors Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 307241 + fixed Bug#307241: gcc-3.4: FTBFS: doxygen segfault processing libstdc++v3 headers Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit St

Processing of gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.changes

gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12.1.dsc gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12.1.diff.gz cpp-3.4-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb libgcj5-common_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb libstdc++6-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb g77-3.4-doc_3.4.3-12.1_all.deb gnat-3.4-doc_3.4

[Bug libfortran/18122] [4.0 only] gfortran internal error in namelist read

--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2005-05-02 16:29 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 only] gfortran internal error in namelist read pault at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > > --- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 > 16:16 --- > The

Re: Need gcc3.2

Brodwyn Lyndon writes: > Hi. I am a research student at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. > > I am trying to install a speech software environment that requires > gcc3.2 (higer versions give compilation errors). > > Would it be possible to make it, with it's dependencies available to m

Bug#140201: [Bug libstdc++/10350] thread-safety problem in std::string.

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-02 13:32 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21334 *** -- What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug c++/18384] [3.3 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty initializer...

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|3.4.3 |3.3.5 3.3.6 3.4.3 Known to work|3.3 3.4.0 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.4 |3.3 3.3.4 3.4.0 3.4.1 3.4.2

[Bug c++/18384] [3.3 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty initializer...

-- What|Removed |Added Known to work|3.3 3.4.0 3.4.4 4.0.0 4.1.0 |3.3 3.4.0 3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.4 ||4.0.0 4.1.0 Target Milestone|3.3