Dear friendly Debian GCC folks,
I believe I've encountered this bug as well. Here's the scenario: I'm
starting to work on a package (homework, so I'm starting with half a dozen
source files alreay), tinkering away, happily compiling, when suddenly:
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:1
--- Additional Comments From sxanth at ceid dot upatras dot gr 2004-12-13
22:25 ---
This is present in 3.4 too
static inline int foo ()
{
return 100;
}
typedef int (*fptr)();
static const fptr a [] = { foo };
static inline int call
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13
21:01 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|18241 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-12-13 20:36 ---
Should be fixed with today's checkin to tree-ssa-dom.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:47:41 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> please get the libgcc1 package from the unstable
Matthias> distribution.
I think I've got that one already (libgcc1 v3.4.3-2).
Matthias> It's currently built by the gcc-3.4 sources and inclu
David Mosberger writes:
> I wanted to try this but found that the gcc-3.3 has a libgcc1 package
> for hppa only. Is this intentional? I thought a new libgcc1 package
> for ia64 was needed so we pick up the libunwind built from the
> libunwind sources.
please get the libgcc1 package from the unst
Hi Matthias,
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:55:57 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> with the patch attached and an updated gcc-3.3 package,
Matthias> libunwind support for ia64 seems to work for me. I
Matthias> couldn't install any of the built packages. I'd lik
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-12-13 10:38 ---
> I.e. though this PR and PR18542 might be the same for the m68k, I doubt this
bug
> to be identical to the ICE on the avr.
You can easily check that by testing if reverting the patch from comment #2
helps.
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13
10:19 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> And you also need -m68020 to trigger the bug. Works
> fine with -m68000, so the bug must hide in one of the
> TARGET_68020 patterns.
Note: PR 18542 also covers avr-* targets.
I
--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2004-12-13 09:45
---
Please see additional comments attached to PR18542:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18542
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2004-12-13 09:44
---
*** Bug 18542 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Think getting a 1.95% ra . t e is impossible?
Think AGAIN!
We can offer you the absolute rock-bottom lowe s t ra t e,g u a ranteed.
We work with all c r edit types. Visit our site now
http://www.theseto.com/
Malinda Vigil
of elves. for univac
via indefatigable, proscription c
--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2004-12-13 09:29
---
It happens both on ColdFire and 680x0 (x>=2), but not
on 68000.
output_addr_const() gets passed a TRUNCATE (HImode) rtx.
I could find it in the last dump before the ICE:
(insn 87 45 127 3 (set (reg:HI 0 %d0 [3
--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2004-12-13 09:14
---
And you also need -m68020 to trigger the bug. Works
fine with -m68000, so the bug must hide in one of the
TARGET_68020 patterns.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18592
--- You are receivi
15 matches
Mail list logo
