--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2004-12-02 04:53 ---
I haven't done a ton of analysis on this PR, but from the looks of it,
I would hazard a guess the problem is in the reload inheritance code
inside choose_reload_regs. Which happens to be code I'm not terribly
familia
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Nov 28 07:33:40 UTC 2004
Native configuration is powerpc-linux (voltaire)
=== gpc tests ===
Running target any
=== gpc Summary ===
# of tests3953
# of expected passes 3948
# of unsupported tests5
/build/buildd/gcc-3.4-
Accepted:
cpp-3.4_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
fastjar_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/fastjar_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
g++-3.4_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
g77-3.4_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g77-3.4_3.4.3
gcc-3.4_3.4.3-2_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-3.4-base_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
libgcc2_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
cpp-3.4_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
gobjc-3.4_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
gij-3.4_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
libgcj5_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
libgcj5-awt_3.4.3-2_m68k.deb
gcj-3.4_3.4
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-12-01 20:54 ---
I've only worked around it by using -O0. The bug is still present and
responsible for most of the testsuite failures.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17356
--- You are receiving this mail be
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10692
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
18:19 ---
I saw that it built now and you posted the results so is this fixed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-12/msg00014.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17356
--- You are rece
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
17:43 ---
I'm downgrading the priority here, as M68K is not a primary platform.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-01 15:08
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 regression] Internal error: Segmentation
fault (program cc1plus)
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
> 2004-
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
13:04 ---
Recategorizing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |mi
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
13:02 ---
Subject: Bug 17431
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-01 12:58:18
Modified files:
gcc/cp : Change
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
12:58 ---
fixed on 3.4 branch too
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
12:57 ---
Testing a fix.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jh at suse dot cz |ebo
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
12:36 ---
Fixed on the mainline at least.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|3.4.1 3.4.2 4.0.0
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
10:22 ---
2004-12-01 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/17431
* call.c (standard_conversion): Add FLAGS parameter. Do not allow
derived to base conversion when checking constructor
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
10:17 ---
Subject: Bug 17431
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-01 10:16:51
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog call.c
gcc/testsui
Package: libgcj5
Version: 3.4.3-2
Followup-For: Bug #283741
Mod parent up!
Please seriously consider refraining from depending on things that have
no place on a non-x86-64 machine. What next, a dependency on
lib64gcc1-arm? -ppc?
Thanks, but no thanks. Why can't people simply run pure64, and let
17 matches
Mail list logo
