Hey.

2004-06-22 Thread Hinson Willie
Hey it's weird, my friend Sara told me today by phone that she tryed to email me but she couldn't for some reason... I'm tired of this computer stuff, never works :/ I don't know if you ever got my messages now, so I don't know if you like me or not... I updated my website recently with few

Why pay m0re ? We can sell you top-rated software for rockk botomm prices! :) bema

2004-06-22 Thread Joy Boucher
>He Who Keeps Company with the Wolf Will Learn How to Howl Hello, just see our prices for most popular software. Looking for not expensive high-quality software? We might have just what you need. Adobe PhotoShop CS 8.0 ... Only $40, You s'ave $569 bucks! MS Windows XP Professional

The best way to Sa,ve big money - by ordering soft from chea p-cd! conceive

2004-06-22 Thread Jodi Palacios
>One good turn deserves half the blankets Hello, just see our prices for most popular software. Looking for not expensive high-quality software? We might have just what you need. Adobe PhotoShop CS 8.0 ... Only $40, You s'ave $569 bucks! MS Windows XP Professional ...

gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_alpha.changes ACCEPTED

2004-06-22 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_alpha.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_alpha.deb Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Processing of gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_alpha.changes

2004-06-22 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-snapshot_20040620-1_alpha.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

OEMCDSoftware.ManySpecialOffers

2004-06-22 Thread Lynnh
http://zZDEi.bjckkbff.info/?0fy5yhwaB47Viw0DMDtL

intuition

2004-06-22 Thread Elba Gamble
shipwreck tuberculin Music & MP3s Movies Games Software TV Shows Song Lyrics Audio Books http://www.downtownheat.com/ref9.html if u feel not filesharetoday.com/tuck.html fromTue, 22 Jun 2004 14:45:21 -0800

[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2004-06-22 Thread mckinlay at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-06-22 16:51 --- Confirmed with HEAD. The problem doesn't occur with native compilation, it is a gij issue only. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/16120] [3.5 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux

2004-06-22 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-22 16:19 --- A quick look at the failing code suggests that it would be the second call to get_insns in arm_finalize_pic that's the culprit here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16120 --- You are

[Bug target/16120] [3.5 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux

2004-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-22 16:03 --- Comfirmed, someone will have to go through the whole of arm.c with a comb to figure out which get_insns () needs to be changed to entry_of_function. -- What|Removed |Ad

Bug#255495: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#255495: gcc-snapshot: Keep debugging symbols)

2004-06-22 Thread Daniel Bonniot
Thanks for your prompt answer. yes, space & bandwidth. the packages get 100%-200% bigger. and if you really want to debug gcc, you need the source and you build it yourself. gcc-snapshot is intended to check for bugs in development versions of gcc, such that package maintainers can have it installe

Bug#255667: gcc-snapshot: FTBFS amd64: No multilib on pure64

2004-06-22 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: gcc-snapshot Severity: important Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source Hi, there is no multilib support on pure64 and gcc-snapshot fails to find a 32bit libc if you try to compile it. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architectur

[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2004-06-22 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||vincent at vinc17 dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 --- You are receiving this ma

[Bug libgcj/16122] gij - Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86

2004-06-22 Thread vincent at vinc17 dot org
--- Additional Comments From vincent at vinc17 dot org 2004-06-22 06:04 --- I don't know very much about Java, but I've talked with someone who has some knowledge in Java and floating point, and according to him, Java FP arithmetic operations must round exactly in double precision (this