Hey there, this is Jessika, I emailed you before but you
didn't reply or I didn't get it ;( I like to chat and I'm
really bored right now :/ Since I liked your profile I
would like to chat with you if you got time. I have my
profile and free webcam chatroom setup at :
http://www.TIFDE.com
It contains the exact same ingredients as regular viaggra, except that you
pay much, much less.
Typically, a 50mg dosage will produce erections lasting up to 4 hours.
First class express mail is used for all international orders.
Penelope Coyer
http://rd.yahoo.com/Dgjgk/Cuilf/Xkm/*http://www.di
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-20
01:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=6577)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6577&action=view)
Possible fix.
Applies against 3.5.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14782
--- You
GET your U N IVERSI T Y D I PL0 M A
Do you want a prosperous future, increased
earning powermore money and the respect of all?
Ca l l this number: 1- 315-546-9663 (24 hours)
There are no required tests, classes, books, or
interviews!
Get a B a chelors, Masters, M BA, and D o ctorat
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-20
00:08 ---
With Carlos's testcase at -O2, the initial insns in the function bug are:
ldi 0,%r20
ldo 1(%r26),%r26
ldo 1(%r20),%r20
ldd 23(%r26),%r21
This appears to be a bug in the PA G
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 12:27:49PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Do you know earlier gcc versions not showing the miscompilation?
> Please can you recheck with gcc-3.4 (found in the experimental
> distribution, or http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/)
>
> Thanks, Matthias
These
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Additional Comments From carlos at baldric dot uwo dot ca 2004-06-19
20:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=6576)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6576&action=view)
Triggers code generation of unaligned load.
Attached is a simpler testcase than the original, I'm trig
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-06-19 15:53
---
Almost positive that's because of a flow patch that's not in 3.3.4 (or 3.4
branch as of the time I did this), but is in mainline and i'll verify 3.4 branch
as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:01:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> For amd64 you can find a gcc-3.3 package that builds from the hammer
> branch at http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc-3.3/. That would allow
> better amd64 support without relying on gcc-3.4. Should be tested by
> the amd64 port mai
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:56:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 08:48:37AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> > arch := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
>
> Shouldn't you be using the DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE instead? (It
> returns the same in this cause,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 03:01:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> For amd64 you can find a gcc-3.3 package that builds from the hammer
> branch at http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc-3.3/. That would allow
> better amd64 support without relying on gcc-3.4. Should be tested by
> the amd64 port mai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 255100 g++
Bug#255100: quantlib FTBFS on amd64: files not found.
Bug reassigned from package `quantlib' to `g++'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Adam C Powell IV writes:
> Greetings,
>
> I was looking through debian-gcc and debian-java for threads on gcc-3.4
> inclusion in sarge, and came across "gcc-3.4 to [sic] unstable for
> amd64" with a post from jgoerzen:
>
> ---
>
> > 2. will gcc-3.4 be included in sarge?
>
> Highly doubtful.
>
Hey there, I'm Michelle, 21 year old female.
I can't find the right man in real life, it's not easy
because you don't know anything about them when you see
them and I'm abit shy wild girl. Anyways, I started going
online and checking out dating profiles and I must say
it's much easier that w
Greetings,
I was looking through debian-gcc and debian-java for threads on gcc-3.4
inclusion in sarge, and came across "gcc-3.4 to [sic] unstable for
amd64" with a post from jgoerzen:
---
> 2. will gcc-3.4 be included in sarge?
Highly doubtful.
> 3. is pure64 going to be included in sarge?
No
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #254831 to gcc-gnats as PR 15937
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR15937
> forwarded 254831 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR15937
Bug#254831: gcc-3.3: [PR middle-end/15937] cannot bootstrap current mainline
Noted your statement that Bug has been f
Martin Habets writes:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.4-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Am building linux kernel 2.6.6 with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y set in
> .config.
> This results in -Os parameter to gcc.
> Resulting kernel does not boot and causes an oops (see below). This comes from
> th
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:17:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing report, not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:20:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#254623: gcj-3.3: won't run without libgcj.spec
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
20 matches
Mail list logo
