--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-02 21:06 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] exception in constructor of a class to be thrown
is not caught
"jason at redhat dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] exception in cons
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-03-02 20:54
---
Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] exception in constructor of a
class to be thrown is not caught
On 2 Mar 2004 20:44:22 -, "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you think, the
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre3
Severity: normal
[I checked 1:3.3.3-1, and it doesn't have this functionality, either.]
Please apply the following patches from upstream CVS so that glibc can
also be modified to support backtracing on ia64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/Ch
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-03-02 20:44 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] exception in constructor of a class to be thrown
is not caught
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Only a 3.3 regression now.
Jason,
Do y
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-02
20:30 ---
Only a 3.3 regression now.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|3.2.3 3.5.0
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-02
19:57 ---
Subject: Bug 13944
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-02 19:57:10
Modified files:
gcc/cp : Change
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Franck Branjonneau
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Can't define inline overloaded template function members out
>of their class.
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: rejects-legal ice-on-le
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-03-02 17:17
---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 Regression] exception in constructor
of a class to be thrown is not caught
On 2 Mar 2004 11:10:38 -, "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Additional Co
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-02
11:10 ---
Jason, what about gcc 3.4, can the patch be applied there, too?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13944
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are wat
9 matches
Mail list logo