LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 25 16:09:13 UTC 2004
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/sp
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||2.95.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5458
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:32:51PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please could you recheck the status of the two reports with current
> gcc-3.3 from unstable, and if you see the same behaviour, try to
> reproduce it with gcc-snapshot (gcc-3.4)?
I still see the same memory consumption with current
Please could you recheck the status of the two reports with current
gcc-3.3 from unstable, and if you see the same behaviour, try to
reproduce it with gcc-snapshot (gcc-3.4)?
Thanks, Matthias
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
19:08 ---
*** Bug 13947 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
19:08 ---
This is a dup of bug 5458. (even though their testcases are different, I can
reduce it to the same
problem).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5458 ***
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
18:56 ---
Confirmed, most likely what needs to happen is to add a check to libstdc++'s
configure for llabs.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
18:25 ---
I will try to deal with this with my clean up branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Assigne
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
18:24 ---
*** Bug 13945 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-31
18:24 ---
This is a dup of bug 6614.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6614 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
---
#>ÒüË~n1¢Mr†íûŽù¸¤¢÷¿Ö|„ô"ïb‘~TïÞ?…{ø34zÛ(ÂÛpêoDÎÖ“ŠìrÒ°åÖà‹é‰ˆ¢_?.L·,Ôòr÷‡(›«Xj‹
©…ÁÊlûOeMû’ÚÞÀwh>©Ñ©l×a^›Û½ä&I
HqCä›)×"Ì3˜*ú?kߧˆ`ö#|èÊÛµÁXM™hËa0B–9?—ÙX$¾2ÌWÜoºóŒéú~ïj|“§ck´ŸŠeWÓ«ê$Bç(Û
œu}t•pm$£„_ÚS\{öŠ\”Pü1¡ÅDHñÎ,MÅ?$Sk
L2*¸sTÔzJÇÛ6Ü_té%¶›L³‡Ï}Y²–}º÷²‰Gµ?FÁý—ä´¶y:&¨§*ýE…¼œ\X<îYçžš.´ðø„Ý
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 226670 bison-1.35
Bug#226670: gcc-3.3: implicitly declared function returns a pointer that is used
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `bison-1.35'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #222497 to gcc-gnats as PR 13947
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13947
> forwarded 222497 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13947
Bug#222497: ptr_fun doesn't recognise argument
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #225935 to gcc-gnats as PR 456
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR456
> forwarded 225935 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR456
Bug#225935: gcc-3.3: function static variable initialization allowed with pure
functions only when -O is used
Noted your s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #215445 to gcc-gnats as PR 2370
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2370
> forwarded 215445 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR2370
Bug#215445: --main needs to be always specified on command line
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #212248 to gcc-gnats as PR 13946
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13946
> forwarded 212248 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13946
Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files
Noted your statement that Bug has bee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #226952 to gcc-gnats as PR 13945
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13945
> forwarded 226952 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13945
Bug#226952: gcc-3.3: -Wconversion is annoying
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #228099 to gcc-gnats as PR 13944
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13944
> forwarded 228099 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13944
Bug#228099: g++-3.3: exception in constructor of a class to be thrown is not
caught
Noted your statement that Bug ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #228645 to gcc-gnats as PR 13943
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13943
> forwarded 228645 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13943
Bug#228645: libstdc++5-3.3-dev: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
Noted your statement that Bug has been f
> Ben, please could you update the status regarding newer gcj-3.3 /
> gcc-snapshot packages?
Yep, sorry - got quite a bit busy these last few weeks. I will get to
it.
b.
Ben, please could you update the status regarding newer gcj-3.3 /
gcc-snapshot packages?
21 matches
Mail list logo
