reassign 227894 valgrind
quit
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 08:03:09AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 227894 kernel-tree-2.6.0
> Bug#227894: g++ exceptions thrown -> valgrind signals invalid read
> Bug reassigned from package `g++' t
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9363
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds1-0pre2.diff.gz
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds1-0pre2.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:26:12, the fil
cpp-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre0_all.deb doesn't exist
libgcj-common_3.3.3-0pre0_all.deb doesn't exist
libstdc++5-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre0_all.deb doesn't exist
g77-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre0_all.deb doesn't exist
gnat-3.3-doc_3.3.3-0pre0_all.deb doesn't exist
gpc-2.1-3.3-doc_3.3.3.20030830-0pre0_all.deb doesn't exist
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13072
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3.orig.tar.gz has incorrect size; deleting it
cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_i386.deb has incorrect size; deleting it
libgcj4_3.3.3-0pre3_i386.deb has incorrect size; deleting it
Due to the errors above, the .changes file couldn't be processed.
Please fix the problems for the upload to happen.
--
What|Removed |Added
List of versions||3.3
known to work||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13722
-
--
What|Removed |Added
List of versions||3.3
known to work||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11295
-
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
List of versions||3.3
known to work||
h
--
What|Removed |Added
List of versions||3.3
known to work||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371
-
--
What|Removed |Added
List of versions||3.3
known to work||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11983
-
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-01-25 22:33
---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My latest bootstrap succeeded. I didn't run the testsuite, and I still
> had some debug code in there just to be safe, but I don'
Rejected: no source found for gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3
(gnat-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb).
Rejected: no source found for gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3
(gcc-3.3-hppa64_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb).
Rejected: no source found for gcc-3.3 1:3.3.3ds3-0pre3
(gpc-2.1-3.3_3.3.3.20030830-0pre3_hppa.deb).
Rejected: no
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3.diff.gz
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:24:08, the fil
gcc-3.3_3.3.3ds3-0pre3_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-3.3-base_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb
libgcc1_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb
cpp-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb
protoize_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb
fixincludes_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb
gobjc-3.3_3.3.3-0pre3_hppa.deb
libobj
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 11:03:53AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:05:17PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > But the root of the problem lies in gcc 3.0.4 since it is OK in 3.3.2. So
> > wouldn't it be easier to identify and backport the fix from 3.3.2 to 3.0.4
> > and infor
Package: libstdc++5-3.3-doc
Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre2
Severity: normal
Hi,
here is the problem:
$ man -k std:: | grep unknown
std::__debug_alloc (3) - (unknown subject)
std::__debug_alloc - (3) [std::__debug_alloc] - (unknown subject)
std::__default_alloc_template (3) - (unknown subject)
std::__de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 222357 + woody upstream fixed-upstream wontfix
Bug#222357: gcc bug pr9164 present in stable/Alpha
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody, upstream, fixed-upstream, wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
tags 222357 + woody upstream fixed-upstream wontfix
thanks
maybe you want to build a recent compiler from the current testing
distribution? gcc-2.96 has never been tested/used on the alpha on
Debian.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:05:17PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> But the root of the problem lies in gcc 3.0.4 since it is OK in 3.3.2. So
> wouldn't it be easier to identify and backport the fix from 3.3.2 to 3.0.4
> and inform all projects that they must recompile everything on parisc ?
"recompi
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:26:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Bug c++/13857] nested namespaces error msg
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 202016 + fixed-upstream
Bug#202016: [PR 11635] [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnecessary store onto stack
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> retitle 202016 [fixed in 3.4] [PR 11635] [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnecessary
> store onto stack
Bug#202
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 228018 + fixed-upstream
Bug#228018: gcc-3.3: [alpha] cc1 Internal error when building fceu-0.97.5
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> retitle 228018 [fixed in 3.4] [alpha] cc1 Internal error when building
> fceu-0.97.5
Bug#228018: gc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 228421 + woody
Bug#228421: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code on Debian 3.0/PARISC
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody
> tags 228421 + fixed-upstream
Bug#228421: gcc 3.0.4 generates bad code on Debian 3.0/PARISC
Tags were: woody
Tags added: fixed-
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 05:36:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tags 228421 + woody
> tags 228421 + fixed-upstream
> thanks
>
> Well, maybe a recompilation and binary NMU for apache would suffice?
recompiling apache with -O1 is enough, that's what I did here and it works.
> Should the report b
Alexander Motzkau writes:
> Package: g++-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.2-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi there,
>
> Running the following code compiled with 'g++-3.3 testex.cc'
> results in a SIGABRT. I see no reason why this should happen.
> With g++ 3.2 it works, i.e. the exception 1 in A() is caught
> by t
> > I am just wondering if bug # 225621 (g77-3.3: sometimes generates invalid
> > assembly code on m68k) has been noticed, since I haven't seen it mentioned
> > anywhere on these mailing lists. Apologies if I'm being redundant.
>
> it needs to be rechecked using gcc-snapshot and forwarded
> upstre
tags 228421 + woody
tags 228421 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Well, maybe a recompilation and binary NMU for apache would suffice?
Should the report be reassignd to apache?
Willy Tarreau writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 2:3.0.4-5
>
> Kernel: Linux hp 2.4.24-pa0 #1 Sun Jan 11 18:48:21 CET 2004 parisc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 192135 [fixed in 3.5] [Bug ada/10889] Convention Fortran matrices
> mishandled in generics
Bug#192135: [PR 10889] Convention Fortran matrices mishandled in generics
Changed Bug title.
> tags 192135 + fixed-upstream
Bug#192135: [fixed in 3.5] [
Kevin B. McCarty writes:
> Hi all,
> I am just wondering if bug # 225621 (g77-3.3: sometimes generates invalid
> assembly code on m68k) has been noticed, since I haven't seen it mentioned
> anywhere on these mailing lists. Apologies if I'm being redundant.
it needs to be rechecked using gcc-snaps
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-25
16:04 ---
I had to reread the report but I now agree with Gaby that the error is right
and there is no way for
GCC to read your mind.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 227894 kernel-tree-2.6.0
Bug#227894: g++ exceptions thrown -> valgrind signals invalid read
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `kernel-tree-2.6.0'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 16:00 ---
Subject: Re: nested namespaces error msg
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Confirmed but not a regression.
It is not even a bug.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-01-25 15:55 ---
Subject: Re: New: nested namespaces error msg
"debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/229088]
|
| seen in 3.3.3 and 3.4 CVS
|
|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-25
15:55 ---
Confirmed but not a regression.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #229088 to gcc-gnats as PR 13857
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13857
> forwarded 229088 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR13857
Bug#229088: g++-3.3: nested namespaces error msg
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.o
Nikita V. Youshchenko writes:
> Hello.
>
> Some time ago I posted a patch for gcc-3.3 source package that enables
> cross-compiler build.
>
> Using that patch, I built cross-compilers for arm-linux and started to use
> them to build software for my Ipaq.
>
> Today I've got an ICE.
>
> I was a
reassign 227894 kernel-tree-2.6.0
thanks
I'm sure Herbert will properly reassign this or close the report ...
Gunther Laure writes:
> I just booted an older kernel 2.4.22.
> At this version everything works as expected! Valgrind reports no
> errors! This error now maybe has to be transferred to t
Matijs van Zuijlen writes:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre2
> Severity: normal
>
> When complied with -O -funroll-loops on powerpc, the attached test.i
> produces the following output:
>
> Bytes in main: 0 1
> Bytes in: 0 1 0 1 0 1 ( 0 10 15 254)
> x = 282
> Bytes in: 0 1 0 1 0 1 ( 94
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.3-0pre2
Severity: normal
When complied with -O -funroll-loops on powerpc, the attached test.i
produces the following output:
Bytes in main: 0 1
Bytes in: 0 1 0 1 0 1 ( 0 10 15 254)
x = 282
Bytes in: 0 1 0 1 0 1 ( 94 52 15 254)
x = 418
Bytes in: 0 1 0 1 0 1 ( 7 208
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 218710 - wontfix confirmed
Bug#218710: gnumeric: FTBFS with gcc 2.95
Tags were: wontfix confirmed
Tags removed: wontfix, confirmed
> reassign 218710 gcc-2.95
Bug#218710: gnumeric: FTBFS with gcc 2.95
Bug reassigned from package `gnumeric' to `gcc-
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com 2004-01-25
07:40 ---
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix
My latest bootstrap succeeded. I didn't run the testsuite, and I still
had some debug code in there just to be safe, but I don't think either
of those issues should matte
42 matches
Mail list logo
