[Bug c++/13518] "virtual functions but non-virtual destructor" warning incomplete

2004-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

Bug#225663: gcc 3.3 pre0 was fine however pre1 was not

2004-01-01 Thread Ken Foskey
Just to isolate the problem some more the issue was NOT present in gcc3.3.3pre0 it appeared in pre1. -- Thanks KenF OpenOffice.org developer

Bug#161432: [Bug target/8603] [Alpha] s?addl pattern doesn't work

2004-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8603 --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug java/2499] Class members should be inherited from implemented interfaces

2004-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-01 08:14 --- Very related to bug 9869. -- What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2003-12-17 05:00:30

Bug#225663: conflict with enum and function as well.

2004-01-01 Thread Ken Foskey
Below are messages. enum contains remove within a named enum and remove is a function. In c++ there is no conflict. Making: ../../unxlngi4.pro/slo/basicparser.obj ccache g++-3.3 -fmessage-length=0 -c -I. -I. -I../inc -I../../source/inc -I../../inc -I../../unx/inc -I../../unxlngi4.pro/inc -I. -I