--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
19:22 ---
The conversion between strings and char* is another for another PR which is
already
filed as PR 8586.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
18:34 ---
This is fixed for 3.4 for sure (are you sure you had rechecked it right?).
No error messages:
[omni:~/src/gccPRs/pr12217] pinskia% vi p/E.java
[omni:~/src/gccPRs/pr12217] pinskia% vi q/F.java
[omni:~/src/gcc
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
18:11 ---
Weird, it works on ipl32 mode and lp64 mode.
Confirmed on the mainline.
You do not need ia64 hardware to recheck this.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
18:04 ---
Confirmed. A better explation is that there is no warning if there is not a
destructor there at all.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2003-12-30 18:02
---
String literals are in fact a sspecial case in the C++ standard, since
there is an implicit conversion to (non-const) char*. It is deprecated though,
and g++ should probably warn about it.
Aso for the error message
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
17:56 ---
typeof just returns the type of the tree which it is bound to, so it looks like
the front-end is getting
the type wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13519
--- You are receiving
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
17:52 ---
Confirmed, some how a target problem as in ix86_split_long_move, it is spliting
them into two
constants but nothing has changed for 3.4 with respect to ix86_split_long_move.
--
What|Remove
sorry, i misread the version number.
zw
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
17:41 ---
*** Bug 13514 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
17:40 ---
This is a dup of bug 12441 and it will not be fixed for 3.3.3 as it is reload
is very declate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12441 ***
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
17:21 ---
*** Bug 13513 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
17:21 ---
This is a dup of bug 2499.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2499 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-30
17:17 ---
It is not a special case in the C++ standard at all, the problem is that you
are trying to a constant
and make it a reference which is wrong. Yes the error message is confussing, I
thought I saw a
bug l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 215445 --main needs to be always specified on command line
Bug#215445: gcj-3.3: no compila un archivo
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 224200 + upstream
Bug#224200: gcc-3.3 fails to generate EH_FRAME program-header
Tags were: sid
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 10:27:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#211783: [Bug optimization/12576] [3.3 regression]
miscompilation of ide-scsi linux kernel driver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: gcc
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: normal
Just want to let you know, that there is probably something wrong with
dependencies for gcc and/or g++ in "testing". Here is what I got today:
Unpacking replacement gcc ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gcc_4%3a3.3.2-1_sparc.deb
(
17 matches
Mail list logo
