[Bug target/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug preprocessor/12375] [3.3/3.4 regression] cpp inserting a spurious newline

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12375 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Results for 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on m68k-unknown-linux-gnu

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Sep 8 19:46:09 UTC 2003 Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu === g++ tests === Running target unix FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6) FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/sp

[Bug preprocessor/12375] [3.3/3.4 regression] cpp inserting a spurious newline

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12375 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

updating gcc-3.3 to the final gcc-3.3.2 release for sarge

gcc-3.3.2 is supposed to be release in early October. Since the last snapshot in Debian, at least one wrong-code-gen bug and one regression reported to the Debian BTS is fixed upstream (besides 10 other regressions). Although the toolchain packages are frozen, I want to update the gcc-3.3 packages

Bug#211082: marked as done (treelang-3.3: treelang frontend not installed.)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 19:55:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line AW: Bug#211082: treelang-3.3: treelang frontend not installed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

[Bug target/11793] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11793 --- Additional Comments From david at avoncliff dot com 2003-09-23 17:11 --- I get the following similar error on i386 setup as cross compile to i386 I assume it is the s

[Bug preprocessor/12375] [3.3/3.4 regression] cpp inserting a spurious newline

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12375 --- Additional Comments From drow at mvista dot com 2003-09-23 12:59 --- Subject: Re: New: [3.3/3.4 regression] cpp inserting a spurious newline On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at

Processed: Re: Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 212248 wishlist Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files Severity set to `wishlist'. > tags 212248 - patch Bug#212248: gcc-3.3: build fail for libobj not including boehm-gc include files Tags were: patch

Re: updating gcc-3.3 to the final gcc-3.3.2 release for sarge

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > gcc-3.3.2 is supposed to be release in early October. Since the last > snapshot in Debian, at least one wrong-code-gen bug and one regression > reported to the Debian BTS is fixed upstream (besides 10 other > regressions). > > Altho

Bug#212085: Build-dependencies cannot be satisfied in unstable

On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 23:58, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > It is a problem for us to ship binary packages that we cannot build. What > happens if we needed to do an urgent update on this package (e.g., > security)? Or if a user needs to patch and rebuild it? >From what I recall, fixing libstdc++3 to b