PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-29
23:56 ---
Subject: Bug 11928
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-08-29
23:51 ---
Subject: Bug 11928
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
janis187 at us dot ibm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Petrisor Marian wrote:
> > Multi-line string literals are not valid in C. Fix the code, or use a
> > newer kernel version.
>
> If multi-line string literals are not valid in C, why gcc 2.95
> recognizes and correctly compiles this section?"
An accidental compiler extension.
5 matches
Mail list logo