LAST_UPDATED: Tue Aug 12 08:34:50 UTC 2003
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Aug 15 17:56:32 UTC 2003
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-2.C (test for excess errors)
WARNING: g++.dg/eh/simd-2.C compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pretty1.C scan-assem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 155824 !
Bug#155824: wmaker: WindowMaker crashes with signal 6 on startup
Changed Bug submitter from "Markus Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Markus
=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 179217 !
Bug#179217: mozilla-br
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11942
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11943
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11941
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11941
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:17:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205226: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:17:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205207: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
g77-doc_3.3.1-2_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
cpp-doc_3.3.1-2_i386.deb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
gpc-doc_2.95.4-24
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-24_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-24_i386.deb
cpp-doc_3.3.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_3.3.1-2_i386.deb
cpp_3.3.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.3.1-2_i386.deb
g++_3.3.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 198261 [fixed in 3.4] ICE when using namespaced typedef of primitive
> type as struct
Bug#198261: g++ segfaults when using namespaced typedef of primitive type as
struct
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:43:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Implicit Conversion Allowed in Container Object Insertion
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
retitle 198261 [fixed in 3.4] ICE when using namespaced typedef of primitive
type as struct
thanks
a snapshot of gcc-3.4 is availabe in the gcc-snapshot package.
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:19:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line maxima built on hppa and ia64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
15 matches
Mail list logo
