Matthias Klose wrote:
>Marcus Brinkmann writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:05:13AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> > IIRC the Hurd can be built for i586 only, so it could be used as
>the
>> > default target CPU as well.
>>
>> We only require a coprocessor, but anything < i586 doesn't make much
Accepted:
cpp-3.3_3.3.1-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/cpp-3.3_3.3.1-1_sparc.deb
fastjar_3.3.1-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fastjar_3.3.1-1_sparc.deb
fixincludes_3.3.1-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.3/fixincludes_3.3.1-1_sparc.deb
g++-3.3_3.3.1-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-08-07
22:10 ---
Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
rsandifo at redhat d
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2003-08-07 18:24
---
Subject: Re: New: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
"debian-gcc at lists
On Thu, 2003-08-07 08:34:37 +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
> > Would Debian accept two ix86 distributions? One i386 and, say, i[56]86?
>
> No, unless you can explain why you need to run KDE, eclipse and
> openoffice on an
Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
> Would Debian accept two ix86 distributions? One i386 and, say, i[56]86?
No, unless you can explain why you need to run KDE, eclipse and
openoffice on an i386. This has to be a subset due to bandwidth and
disk limitations.
> I'd even volunteer to rebuild all the package
Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would Debian accept two ix86 distributions? One i386 and, say, i[56]86?
Most developers probably would, if presented with a sound plan that
makes that happen and has no downsides (except for the obvious one
that ftp archives will need more space).
Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You are wrong. There are two versions of atomicity.h, one for i486+,
> > and the other for i386+ (at the time the other distributors released
> > their compilers, there was only the i486+ version, and it was assumed
> > to work for i386+, but didn'
On Thu, 2003-08-07 07:58:01 +0200, Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Am I wrong or did we, "forced" because we wanted to be binary compatible
> > to some major distributions, just follow others and doing opt
Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I wrong or did we, "forced" because we wanted to be binary compatible
> to some major distributions, just follow others and doing optimization
> just as they did?
You are wrong. There are two versions of atomicity.h, one for i486+,
and the other
On Wed, 2003-08-06 15:52:31 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw said:
> >...and up to now, I haven't seen real hard numbers that show that
> >optimizing for i486 does really make anything noticeable faster. From
>
> I've given such
On Wed, 2003-08-06 17:22:19 -0400, Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:08:22PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Jan-Benedict Glaw writes:
>
> Someone is making statements without knowing the real situation.
> Changing to hwmul ops in l
On Thu, 2003-08-07 00:48:04 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:43:35AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-08-06 23:08:22 +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
On Thu, 2003-08-07 01:13:18 +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Marcus Brinkmann writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:05:13AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > IIRC the Hurd can be built for i586 only, so it could be used as the
> > > default target
15 matches
Mail list logo