[ No bug submitted yet - I wanted to discuss this here first ]
The following changelog entry appears to be the cause of recent
breakages in GCC on the netbsd-i386 port:
gcc-3.2 (1:3.2.1ds5-0pre6) unstable; urgency=medium
* Always configure with --enable-clocale=gnu. The autobuilders do have
Now that the estimated release of gcc-3.3 is not far away, I made an
experimental gcc-3.3 package. You'll find it at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/gcc-3.3
Source packages will be there tomorrow. TODO's are:
- drop cpp package, as we don't have a standalone cpp anymore.
We still ne
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 19 09:21:51 UTC 2003
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: 22_locale/codecvt_members_char_char.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/codecvt_members_wchar_t_char.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/ctor
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 19 09:21:51 UTC 2003
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5)
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
GOTO Masanori writes:
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:48:04PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > > I haven't seen mention of it on this list, so I wanted to bring it up -
> > > Bug #175526 against glibc is m68k specific.
> >
> > interesting. I am running glibc-2.3 and gcc-3.2 without much problems
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:48:04PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > I haven't seen mention of it on this list, so I wanted to bring it up -
> > Bug #175526 against glibc is m68k specific.
>
> interesting. I am running glibc-2.3 and gcc-3.2 without much problems
> here, will look if I can see som
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jan 2003 20:05:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#176112: broken alternative f77
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 177433 gcc-3.2
Bug#177433: gcc-3.2 on m68k: internal compiler error while compiling texmacs
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `gcc-3.2'.
> retitle 177433 {m68} internal compiler error while compiling texmacs
Bug#177433: gcc-3.2 on m68k: int
Synopsis: [3.3 branch regression] bootstrap failures on arm-linux
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: doko
State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 21 19:16:50 2003
State-Changed-Why:
does bootstrap again. see:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=gcc-snapshot
http://gcc.g
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 176196 xmame
Bug#176196: gcc-3.2: internal error compiling with optimizations for Athlon
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.2' to `xmame'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
reassign 176196 xmame
thanks
reassigning to xmame. unable to reproduce. note: the preprocessed
source file and the compilation flags used are needed before
reassigning the report back to gcc-3.2.
Xesc Arbona writes:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> I'm tryin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 176387 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#176387: {sparc} gcc-3.2 regression
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 176387 [PR optimization/9279] {sparc} gcc-3.2 regression (wrong code)
Bug#176387: {sparc} gcc-3.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 177016 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#177016: {m68k} Internal error while building hdf5
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 177016 [PR optimization/9389] {m68k} Internal error while building
> hdf5
Bug#1770
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `optimization/9389'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: optimization
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: [3.2 regression, m68k-linux] ICE in
>instantiate_virtual_
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: optimization
>Class: ice-on-legal-code
>Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unsta
| > From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:56:07 +0100
| >
| > objc-parse.y: conflicts: 31 shift/reduce, 1 reduce/reduce
| > objc-parse.y: expected 0 reduce/reduce conflicts
|
| Thanks for the bug report. This failure is due to two recent changes
| to Bison. The
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:02:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177671: gcc-3.2: failure to compile w/ -march=pentium2 (or
greater) - FP register starvation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 177679 !
Bug#177679: NetBSD/i386 does not successfully build Ada or Java
Changed Bug submitter.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Your message dated: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 07:11:39 +0100
>- please attach the preprocessed source file for the arch setting,
> that fails to compile.
>
>- recheck with the gcc-snapshot package.
i just upgraded gcc-3.2 to the version in unstable (was testing). It
now seems to compile fine.
so, this
Am 21.01.2003 06:41:14, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>Package: gcc-3.2
>Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre3
>Severity: normal
>
>
>xine-lib-1-beta2 fails to compile w/ -march=pentium2 (or greater). it
>will compile w/ -march=pentiumpro or with any -mcpu setting.
>
>it looks like a failure in the FP register a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> xine-lib-1-beta2 fails to compile w/ -march=pentium2 (or greater). it
> will compile w/ -march=pentiumpro or with any -mcpu setting.
>
> it looks like a failure in the FP register allocator or the M
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 3.2.2ds4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The NetBSD/i386 port does not currently cope well with building Ada or
Java; as such, I would request that the attached patches be accepted until
such time as we can get things to pass the test suites and work in some
sane fashion.
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre3
Severity: normal
xine-lib-1-beta2 fails to compile w/ -march=pentium2 (or greater). it
will compile w/ -march=pentiumpro or with any -mcpu setting.
it looks like a failure in the FP register allocator or the MD for p2+
class cpus. at least to my untrai
23 matches
Mail list logo
