Daniel E Baumann writes:
> No files include g++-v3. I grepped and got nothing. This makes sense
> becase those headers are from libstc++3, IIRC, which I am not using. I
> don't understand why gdb wants to pull headers from there. This makes
> no sense to me.
Is there an old .gdbinit laying around?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 177041 bison
Bug#177041: g++-3.2: bison output not compilable with g++-3.2 due to
__atttribute__((__unused__))
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.2' to `bison'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:16:21PM -0600, Daniel E Baumann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:32:38AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:13:14PM -0600, Daniel E Baumann wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:05:55PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 1
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:32:38AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:13:14PM -0600, Daniel E Baumann wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:05:55PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:15:04AM -0600, Daniel E Baumann wrote:
> > > > Package: libs
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthias> so which runtimes do have complete awt support at all?
Matthias> The provides was added to build all packages which do
Matthias> not relay on all awt functionality. I would have to
Matthias> search the bug rep
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:39:44AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At 16 Jan 2003 18:38:07 +,
> Philip Blundell wrote:
> > So, per our IRC discussion this afternoon, I think the current plan for
> > this is to have ld.so treat CMOV as an optional extension, similar to
> > how MMX is handled. In
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:13:14PM -0600, Daniel E Baumann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:05:55PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:15:04AM -0600, Daniel E Baumann wrote:
> > > Package: libstdc++5
> > > Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre5
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > >
Could someone comment this issue?
Openmosix is a kernel patch for 2.4.19 we have also in archives.
- Forwarded message from Moshe Bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 11:32:29 +0200
Subject: RE: [Openmosix-devel] Compiling vani
Philip Blundell schrieb:
> On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 07:38, Christoph Martin wrote:
>
>>I need some help with this bugreport. I checked that the problem is
>>reproduceable. Could someone please verify that the problem description
>>is correct. Do you think the solution is the right one?
>>;
>>}
>
>
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 07:38, Christoph Martin wrote:
> I need some help with this bugreport. I checked that the problem is
> reproduceable. Could someone please verify that the problem description
> is correct. Do you think the solution is the right one?
> ;
> }
Does this still happen when you com
Hi glibc and gcc Maintainers,
I need some help with this bugreport. I checked that the problem is
reproduceable. Could someone please verify that the problem description
is correct. Do you think the solution is the right one?
Thanks
Christoph
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libssl0.9.6
Ver
11 matches
Mail list logo
