Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The following program illustrates that __builtin_return_address seg faults
> > when
> > you reach the top of the stack rather than returning 0 as it is specified in
> > the gcc manual.
> >
> > I see the same behaviour with both gcc 2.95 and gcc
Package: gnat-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre2
Operating system kernel version: Linux 2.4.17
CPU: Intel i686
The program gnat_bug3, shown below, contains two consecutive comparisons
of Guess and Guess_Low. As can be seen from the program output, the
first comparison indicates that the two variables ar
Daniel Jacobowitz sez:
} On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:48:25PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
} > Daniel Jacobowitz sez:
} > } On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
[...]
} > } > I don't understand why my program seems to be linked to two versions of
} > } > libstdc++. It loo
Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did you take a look at the ldd -v output? It shows none of the
> shared objects depending on that strange libstdc++. Also, AFAIK, I
> am only using three C++ libraries: Qt, Xerces, and glut; I have
> compiled each of them with apt-get source --compile
Joel Baker sez:
[...]
} Er. Are any of the libraries you depend on linked against the old libstdc++
} (say, if any of *them* are C++ libraries, and haven't been recompiled with
} GCC 3.2 - this being the whole situation that leads to the requirement for
} juggling things carefully in the GCC versio
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:48:25PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz sez:
> } On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> } > I am developing a program using g++ 3.2. When I added a dynamic_cast, it
> } > started segfaulting on it. In searching the web I came
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:48:25PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz sez:
> } On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> } > I am developing a program using g++ 3.2. When I added a dynamic_cast, it
> } > started segfaulting on it. In searching the web I came
Daniel Jacobowitz sez:
} On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
} > I am developing a program using g++ 3.2. When I added a dynamic_cast, it
} > started segfaulting on it. In searching the web I came up with the
} > following:
} >
} > http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/20
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> I am developing a program using g++ 3.2. When I added a dynamic_cast, it
> started segfaulting on it. In searching the web I came up with the
> following:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2002/debian-gcc-200205/msg00240.html
I am developing a program using g++ 3.2. When I added a dynamic_cast, it
started segfaulting on it. In searching the web I came up with the
following:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2002/debian-gcc-200205/msg00240.html
It suggests that I mght be linking against two different versions of
libst
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:01:47AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 2:2.95.4-17
> Severity: normal
>
> The following program illustrates that __builtin_return_address seg faults
> when
> you reach the top of the stack rather than returning 0 as it is specified in
> the gc
With -fno-builtin the ICE does not happen.
*
This e-mail and any attachment is confidential. It may only be read, copied and
used by the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s),
you may not copy, use, d
Package: g++-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre4
Severity: normal
Bang uptodate Debian testing/unstable g++-3.2 ICEs on this code.
Interestingly, it's already started generating the .s file. Dude on the gcc
bug list said to send it your way:
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
13 matches
Mail list logo
