On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:31:03PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:09:56PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:01:46PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > >
> > > > My copy of C99 says:
> > > >
> > > > 5The least requirements on a conforming imp
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:09:56PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:01:46PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > > My copy of C99 says:
> > >
> > > 5The least requirements on a conforming implementation are:
> > > - At sequence points, volatile objects are stable i
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:01:46PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > My copy of C99 says:
> >
> > 5The least requirements on a conforming implementation are:
> > - At sequence points, volatile objects are stable in the sense that
> > previou
> > s accesses are
> > compl
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:28:02AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:01:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > I don't see the problem. Volatile in C doesn't provide any sort of
> > barrier; you have to place one yourself if you want one. It only
> > guaranatees that th
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:01:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> I don't see the problem. Volatile in C doesn't provide any sort of
> barrier; you have to place one yourself if you want one. It only
> guaranatees that the two accesses to "i" will not be reordered or
> eliminated.
My copy
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:29:24PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre2
> Severity: normal
>
> The following program produces output where the assignment to j occurs
> before the i has been incremented. This breaks any program using such
> constructs to ensu
If you're promoting your website with bulk email then you need this directory.
Call 1-416-410-2136 for more info.
7 matches
Mail list logo
