gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1_arm.changes ACCEPTED

2002-09-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb g++-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb to pool

Bug#157416: _Pragma() from macros - bug

2002-09-03 Thread Neil Booth
Zack Weinberg wrote:- > This was reported to the Debian bug-tracking system: > > $ cat foo.c > _Pragma("foo"); int y; > #define FOO _Pragma("foo"); int x; > FOO > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cpp-3.2 foo.c > # 1 "foo.c" > # 1 "" > # 1 "" > # 1 "foo.c" > > # 1 "foo.c" > #pragma foo > # 1 "foo.c" >

Processing of gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1_arm.changes

2002-09-03 Thread Archive Administrator
gcc-3.2_3.2.1ds0-0pre1_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gcc-3.2-base_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb libgcc1_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb cpp-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb protoize_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb fixincludes_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb gobjc-3.2_3.2.1-0pre1_arm.deb libobjc1_3.2.

Re: problem with newer gcc

2002-09-03 Thread Martin v. Loewis
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could anyone of you please try to compile tora with gcc 3+ and look into > the error messages? It might be easier if you just report the errors that you get, perhaps along with code fragments that the error messages refer to. Regards, Martin

Re: -2.93745e-306 != 0

2002-09-03 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from LaMont Jones, dated Sep 03: > Bug #158290 talks about an issue with gcc 3.0 on hppa. Specifically, > building perl 5.8 with -O2 fails tests, while -O1 works. > > Any thoughts on the subject? mawk also suffers from the same ailment. bod tells me that with gcc-3.2 t

Re: -2.93745e-306 != 0

2002-09-03 Thread Philip Blundell
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 17:27, LaMont Jones wrote: > Bug #158290 talks about an issue with gcc 3.0 on hppa. Specifically, > building perl 5.8 with -O2 fails tests, while -O1 works. > > Any thoughts on the subject? mawk also suffers from the same ailment. Try gcc 3.1 or 3.2? p.

-2.93745e-306 != 0

2002-09-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Bug #158290 talks about an issue with gcc 3.0 on hppa. Specifically, building perl 5.8 with -O2 fails tests, while -O1 works. Any thoughts on the subject? mawk also suffers from the same ailment. thanks, lamont

Latest upload did compile on hppa

2002-09-03 Thread Michael Meskes
Hi, I'm not sure why it worked this time, but the most recent CVS snapshot I uploaded as tora_1.3.7-4 did compile correctly on hppa as well I just learned. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael@Fam-Meskes.De Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

Bug#159354: gcc-3.2_1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1(unstable/arm): FTBFS: arm patch uses invalid arg to autoconf

2002-09-03 Thread Philip Blundell
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 00:19, James Troup wrote: > 'cos you had already uploaded a newer version by the time it had > finished building. If foo_1.0-1 gets built, it'll only be uploaded as > long as 1.0-2 (source) hasn't gone into the archive. I suppose I > could manually upload the old version, bu

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-03 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 07:20:19AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I believe they're from the dynamic linker (ld.elf_so), in this case. > > That would indicate that the dynamic linker does not know what .hidden > symbols are, which is a problem on its

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-03 Thread Joel Baker
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 07:29:34AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That's from the build area... binutils is currently: > > > > binutils 2.13.90.0.4-1 The GNU assembler, ... > > binutils-dev 2.13.90.0.4-1 The GNU binary utilities ... > > bin

problem with newer gcc

2002-09-03 Thread Michael Meskes
Hi, I'm maintaining tora, a program developed in C++. Now this works find with gcc 2.95, but there is a problem on hppa. It simply doesn't compile there with a strange error message. AFAIK hppa does use gcc 3+ as default so I tried with gcc 3.2 and I also can't get it to compile with error message

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-03 Thread Martin v. Loewis
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's from the build area... binutils is currently: > > binutils 2.13.90.0.4-1 The GNU assembler, ... > binutils-dev 2.13.90.0.4-1 The GNU binary utilities ... > binutils-doc 2.13.90.0.4-1 Documentation for the GNU assembler, ... > binutils-m

Re: GCC 3.2 on the NetBSD/i386 port

2002-09-03 Thread Martin v. Loewis
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe they're from the dynamic linker (ld.elf_so), in this case. That would indicate that the dynamic linker does not know what .hidden symbols are, which is a problem on its own. > > We have to consider __dso_handle and __cxa_atexit separately. For >

Bug#159395: Acknowledgement (FTBFS with MAKEFLAGS="-j2")

2002-09-03 Thread Joel Baker
An additional problem, apparently from the same cause: * make[4]: Entering directory `/tmp/Build/gcc-3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.1ds0/build/fastjar' ... perl ../../src/fastjar/../contrib/texi2pod.pl -D jar < ../../src/fastjar/fastjar.texi > fastjar.pod (pod2man --center="GNU" --release="gcc-" --section=