Hello,
I would like to make a proposal for one aspect of the
gcc 3.2 migration in sid. A critical part of this transition
will be the discovery of how many arches still require creation
of libgcc-compat code in glibc. Currently we are told by Jakub
Jelinek that i386 is fine. Franz Sirl has just
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:28:47PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:55:27AM +0300, Alexei Khlebnikov wrote:
> > > I think this program should not terminate at all because i will
> > > always be one greater than oldi.
> > > I think gcc3.0 has a problem with no optimization
> >
> > Changed my mind. After a posting from Linus on dri-devel and a discussion
> > about integer overflow (undefined) in C the following came out:
>
> Is integer overflow behaviour really undefined? If yes (I want it to be yes
> :),
> then, of course, it's the programmer's fault, not the compil
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:55:27AM +0300, Alexei Khlebnikov wrote:
> > > I think this program should not terminate at all because i will
> > > always be one greater than oldi.
> > > I think gcc3.0 has a problem with no optimization then but since
> > > there is later version that works gcc 3.1.1,
4 matches
Mail list logo
