Re: c/7661: gcc-3.0 optimization bug on debian GNULinux on x86 with very simple program

2002-08-20 Thread Carlos O'Donell
> I think this program should not terminate at all because i will > always be one greater than oldi. > I think gcc3.0 has a problem with no optimization then but since > there is later version that works gcc 3.1.1, upgrade. > > Thanks, > Andrew Pinski > Agreed. Infact it doesn't terminate on a

Processed: Re: Bug#157292: g++: template function default arguments are not handled

2002-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 157292 g++-2.95 Bug#157292: g++: template function default arguments are not handled Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `g++-2.95'. > tags 157292 + fixed Bug#157292: g++: template function default arguments are not handled Tags added: fixed

Re: c/7661: gcc-3.0 optimization bug on debian GNULinux on x86 with very simple program

2002-08-20 Thread Andrew Pinski
I think this program should not terminate at all because i will always be one greater than oldi. I think gcc3.0 has a problem with no optimization then but since there is later version that works gcc 3.1.1, upgrade. Thanks, Andrew Pinski trace ioldi 00 10check here 11 21

gcc-3.0 optimization bug on debian GNULinux on x86 with very simple program

2002-08-20 Thread Thomas Deselaers
>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Thomas Deselaers >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: gcc-3.0 optimization bug on debian GNU/Linux on x86 with very simple >program >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Category: c >Class: wrong-code >Release: 3.0.4 (

Bug#157416: cpp-3.2: _Pragma within macros is improperly expanded

2002-08-20 Thread Andrew Suffield
Package: cpp-3.2 Version: 1:3.2-0pre4 Severity: important [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat foo.c _Pragma("foo"); int y; #define FOO _Pragma("foo"); int x; FOO [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cpp-3.2 foo.c # 1 "foo.c" # 1 "" # 1 "" # 1 "foo.c" # 1 "foo.c" #pragma foo # 1 "foo.c" ; int y; # 3 "foo.c"

Bug#157183: marked as done (g77-3.2: libg2c missing main().)

2002-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:32:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#157183: g77-3.2: libg2c missing main(). has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#156946: marked as done ( not putting assert in namespace std?)

2002-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:36:22 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#156946: cassert> not putting assert in namespace std? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#148676: marked as done (libgcj3: File duplicate)

2002-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 20 Aug 2002 08:35:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in gcc-3.2 packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi