Bug#136359: marked as done (g77-2.95: [ALPHA] Please rebuild libg2c.a with -mieee)

2002-03-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated 21 Mar 2002 20:14:21 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds10-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds10-5

2002-03-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 136359 + fixed Bug#136359: g77-2.95: [ALPHA] Please rebuild libg2c.a with -mieee Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs dat

Fixed in NMU of gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds10-5

2002-03-21 Thread Philip Blundell
tag 136359 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:28:40 + Source: gcc-2.95 Binary: gcc-2.95-doc libstdc++2.10-dbg chill-2.95

gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds10-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2002-03-21 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: chill-2.95_2.95.4-5_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/chill-2.95_2.95.4-5_i386.deb cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-5_all.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95-doc_2.95.4-5_all.deb cpp-2.95_2.95.4-5_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gcc-2.95/cpp-2.95_2.95.4-5_i386.deb g++-2.95_2.95.4-5_i386.deb to pool/m

gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds10-5_i386.changes REJECTED

2002-03-21 Thread Debian Installer
Rejected: gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds10-5.dsc refers to gcc-2.95_2.95.4.ds10.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. Your rejected files are in incoming/REJEC

Bug#78826: marked as done ([fixed upstream 20001205] Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11)

2002-03-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:32:05 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close #78826? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Re: Close #78826?

2002-03-21 Thread Philip Blundell
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 12:16, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > Since I do not have the original sources/patch etc. I am unable to verify > (well I might go searching for it on the net, but I'm lazy). > > But I have been building pine*.deb packages for a long time now > every time a new pine came out so I gu

Re: Close #78826?

2002-03-21 Thread Tomas Pospisek
On 21 Mar 2002, Philip Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 11:21, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > > I guess http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78826 can be > > closed. Maybe someone of your group who knows better than me can affirm > > and close it? > > Does the problem still exist with

Re: Close #78826?

2002-03-21 Thread Philip Blundell
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 11:21, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > I guess http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78826 can be > closed. Maybe someone of your group who knows better than me can affirm > and close it? Does the problem still exist with the latest gcc-2.95 package? It's not clear to me

Close #78826?

2002-03-21 Thread Tomas Pospisek
I guess http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=78826 can be closed. Maybe someone of your group who knows better than me can affirm and close it? *t --- Tomas Pospisek sourcepole- Linux & Open Source Solu

Processed: serious bug

2002-03-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 137959 serious Bug#137959: blas: FTBFS: test failures on hppa Severity set to `serious'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)